From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Coresight ML <coresight@lists.linaro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] coresight: tmc: Add shutdown callback for TMC ETR/ETF
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 19:13:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <07851ea3d1abfe60bb6c1761bf19f62f@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1a5a6a6d-b86d-df45-cf91-7081e70d88a3@arm.com>
Hi Mike,
On 2020-06-03 19:04, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2020-06-03 14:22, Mike Leach wrote:
>> Hi Sai,
>>
>> On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 at 13:14, Sai Prakash Ranjan
>> <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Mike,
>>>
>>> On 2020-06-03 16:57, Mike Leach wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 at 11:24, Sai Prakash Ranjan
>>>> <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Mike,
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks again for looking at this.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2020-06-03 03:42, Mike Leach wrote:
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SMMU/IOMMU won't be able to do much here as it is the client's
>>>>>>> responsiblity to
>>>>>>> properly shutdown and SMMU device link just makes sure that
>>>>>>> SMMU(supplier) shutdown is
>>>>>>> called only after its consumers shutdown callbacks are called.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think this use case can be handled slightly differently than the
>>>>>> general requirements for modular CoreSight drivers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What is needed here is a way of stopping the underlying ETR
>>>>>> hardware
>>>>>> from issuing data to the SMMU, until the entire device has been
>>>>>> shut
>>>>>> down, in a way that does not remove the driver, breaking existing
>>>>>> references and causing a system crash.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We could introduce a new mode to the ETR driver - e.g.
>>>>>> CS_MODE_SHUTDOWN.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> At the end of the block tmc_shutdown(struct amba_device *adev),
>>>>>> set
>>>>>> drvdata->mode to CS_MODE_SHUTDOWN & remove the
>>>>>> coresight_unregister().
>>>>>> This new mode can be used to prevent the underlying hardware from
>>>>>> being able to restart until the device is re-powered.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This mode can be detected in the code that enables / disables the
>>>>>> ETR
>>>>>> and handled appropriately (updates to tmc_enable_etr_sink and
>>>>>> tmc_disable_etr_sink).
>>>>>> This mode will persist until the device is re-started - but
>>>>>> because we
>>>>>> are on the device shutdown path this is not an issue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This should leave the CoreSight infrastructure stable until the
>>>>>> drivers are shut down normally as part of the device power down
>>>>>> process.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sounds good to me, but if the coresight_unregister() is the trouble
>>>>> point
>>>>> causing these crashes, then can't we just remove that from
>>>>> tmc_shutdown()
>>>>> callback? This would be like maintaining the same behaviour as now
>>>>> where
>>>>> on reboot/shutdown we basically don't do anything except for
>>>>> disabling
>>>>> ETR.
>>>>
>>>> No - the new mode prevents race conditions where the thread shutting
>>>> down the SMMU does the ETR shutdown, but then another thread happens
>>>> to be trying to start trace and restarts the ETR.
>>>> It also prevents the condition Mathieu discussed where a thread
>>>> might
>>>> be attempting to shutdown trace - this could try to disable the
>>>> hardware again re-releasing resources/ re-flushing and waiting for
>>>> stop.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I do not think there will a race between SMMU shutdown and ETR
>>> shutdown.
>>> Driver core takes care of calling SMMU shutdown after its consumer
>>> shutdown callbacks via device link, otherwise there would already be
>>> bugs in all other client drivers.
>>>
>>
>> I am not saying there could be a race between tmc_shutdowm and
>> Smmu_shutdown - there may be a case if the coresight_disable_path
>> sequence is running and gets to the point of disabling the ETR after
>> the SMMU callback has disabled it.
>
> I'm confused now - there is no "SMMU callback", we're talking about
> the system-wide cleanup from kernel_shutdown_prepare() or
> kernel_restart_prepare(). As far as I'm aware userspace should be long
> gone by that point, so although trace may have been left running, the
> chance of racing against other driver operations seems pretty
> unlikely.
>
As Robin said, it is not SMMU callback but the normal reboot/shutdown
flow and race is unlikely at that point.
tmc_shutdown()
platform_drv_shutdown()
device_shutdown()
kernel_restart_prepare()
kernel_restart()
If I am not clear enough, first all the consumer shutdown callbacks of
SMMU
are called like above tmc_shutdown() and then we call the
arm_smmu_device_shutdown(),
this ordering is ensured by the device links.
Thanks,
Sai
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-03 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-01 8:02 [PATCH 0/2] coresight: tmc: Add shutdown callback for TMC ETR/ETF Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-06-01 8:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] coresight: tmc: Add enable flag to indicate the status of ETR/ETF Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-06-01 13:27 ` Mike Leach
2020-06-01 17:13 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-06-01 8:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] coresight: tmc: Add shutdown callback for TMC ETR/ETF Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-06-01 13:35 ` Mike Leach
2020-06-01 17:15 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-06-01 21:28 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-06-02 7:30 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-06-02 22:12 ` Mike Leach
2020-06-03 10:24 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-06-03 11:27 ` Mike Leach
2020-06-03 12:14 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-06-03 13:22 ` Mike Leach
2020-06-03 13:34 ` Robin Murphy
2020-06-03 13:43 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan [this message]
2020-06-03 13:51 ` Mike Leach
2020-06-03 14:02 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-06-03 17:44 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-06-04 7:27 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-06-08 14:07 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-06-09 15:27 ` Mathieu Poirier
2020-06-09 15:37 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-06-03 11:37 ` Robin Murphy
2020-06-03 12:00 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-06-03 12:21 ` Robin Murphy
2020-06-03 12:26 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2020-06-03 13:40 ` Robin Murphy
2020-06-03 13:51 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=07851ea3d1abfe60bb6c1761bf19f62f@codeaurora.org \
--to=saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).