From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: rishabhb@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: Documentation for qcom, llcc Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 16:32:27 -0700 Message-ID: <079348edcb511cefb9f4d76877d50cb7@codeaurora.org> References: <1525810921-15878-1-git-send-email-rishabhb@codeaurora.org> <1525810921-15878-2-git-send-email-rishabhb@codeaurora.org> <152649021310.210890.14841324536807182632@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> <385198cbb91c4a36ad758997916ad271@codeaurora.org> <152649413707.210890.2655572242392552759@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <152649413707.210890.2655572242392552759@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Boyd Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm@lists.infradead.org, tsoni@codeaurora.org, ckadabi@codeaurora.org, evgreen@chromium.org, robh@kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On 2018-05-16 11:08, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting rishabhb@codeaurora.org (2018-05-16 10:33:14) >> On 2018-05-16 10:03, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> > Quoting Rishabh Bhatnagar (2018-05-08 13:22:00) >> >> >> + >> >> +- max-slices: >> >> + usage: required >> >> + Value Type: >> >> + Definition: Number of cache slices supported by hardware >> >> + >> >> +Example: >> >> + >> >> + llcc: qcom,llcc@1100000 { >> > >> > cache-controller@1100000 ? >> > >> We have tried to use consistent naming convention as in llcc_* >> everywhere. >> Using cache-controller will mix and match the naming convention. Also >> in >> the documentation it is explained what llcc is and its full form. >> > > DT prefers standard node names as opposed to vendor specific node > names. > Isn't it a cache controller? I fail to see why this can't be done. Hi Stephen, The driver is vendor specific and also for uniformity purposes we preferred to go with this name.