From: Song Xue <quic_songxue@quicinc.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
Manu Gautam <mgautam@codeaurora.org>,
Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>, <kernel@quicinc.com>,
<linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-phy@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] phy: qcom-qusb2: Add regulator_set_load to Qualcomm usb phy
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 16:15:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0a16d52c-eebe-40da-ba02-7f68a7849039@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <vbuo2yel2pdcwnmz32f4t5pb6v3ptt2bcs2t6ybab2jxnkd6e7@rjnsbawj4zpb>
On 11/29/2024 12:43 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 04:09:27PM +0800, Song Xue wrote:
>> Set the current load before enable regulator supplies at QUSB phy.
>>
>> Encountered one issue where the board powered down instantly once the UVC
>> camera was attached to USB port while adding host mode on usb port and
>> testing a UVC camera with the driver on QCS615 platform. The extensible
>> boot loader mentioned that OCP(Over Current Protection) occurred at LDO12
>> from regulators-0 upon powered on board again. That indicates that the
>> current load set for QUSB phy, which use the regulator supply, is lower
>> than expected.
>>
>> As per QUSB spec, set the maximum current load at 30mA to avoid overcurrent
>> load when attach a device to the USB port.
>>
>> Fixes: 937e17f36a32 ("phy: qcom-qusb2: Power-on PHY before initialization")
>> Signed-off-by: Song Xue <quic_songxue@quicinc.com>
>
> The patch looks good. But if we describe the regulator(s) with
> regulator-allow-set-load; and not all the consumers vote for load, the
> sum of the load when USB phy is disabled goes to 0 and we will enter
> LPM.
>
Hi, Bjorn
Thanks for comment.
We dived into the code and found the other all Qualcomm platform's
device tree using the phy-qcom-qusb2's compatible don't use the
"regulator-initial-mode = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>" and
"regulator-allow-set-load" together at the same time. We think the patch
is safe now.
Therefore, can we merge the patch?
Thanks,
Song
> For this reason we're not doing any load requests today. Can you confirm
> that this works fine with a dtb where only HPM is permitted (as well as
> LPM and HPM)? If so I'd be in favor of us merging this change, but
> keeping the dts HPM-only until someone confirms that all consumers of
> these regulators specify load-votes.
>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
>
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Removed "---" above the Fixes.
>> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241121-add_set_load_to_qusb_phy-v1-1-0f44f3a3290e@quicinc.com
>> ---
>> drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qusb2.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qusb2.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qusb2.c
>> index c52655a383cef008552ed4533b9f31d1cbf34a13..80f0d17c42717e843937255a9a780bbae5998535 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qusb2.c
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qusb2.c
>> @@ -722,16 +722,27 @@ static int __maybe_unused qusb2_phy_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +#define QUSB2PHY_HPM_LOAD 30000 /*uA*/
>> +
>> static int qusb2_phy_init(struct phy *phy)
>> {
>> struct qusb2_phy *qphy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
>> const struct qusb2_phy_cfg *cfg = qphy->cfg;
>> unsigned int val = 0;
>> unsigned int clk_scheme;
>> - int ret;
>> + int ret, i;
>>
>> dev_vdbg(&phy->dev, "%s(): Initializing QUSB2 phy\n", __func__);
>>
>> + /* set the current load */
>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(qphy->vregs); i++) {
>> + ret = regulator_set_load(qphy->vregs[i].consumer, QUSB2PHY_HPM_LOAD);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(&phy->dev, "failed to set load at %s\n", qphy->vregs[i].supply);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> /* turn on regulator supplies */
>> ret = regulator_bulk_enable(ARRAY_SIZE(qphy->vregs), qphy->vregs);
>> if (ret)
>>
>> ---
>> base-commit: decc701f41d07481893fdea942c0ac6b226e84cd
>> change-id: 20241121-add_set_load_to_qusb_phy-d1327c797ffe
>>
>> Best regards,
>> --
>> Song Xue <quic_songxue@quicinc.com>
>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-13 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-21 8:09 [PATCH v2] phy: qcom-qusb2: Add regulator_set_load to Qualcomm usb phy Song Xue
2024-11-21 22:24 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-11-23 5:07 ` Song Xue
2024-11-23 16:32 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-11-28 16:43 ` Bjorn Andersson
2024-11-29 10:26 ` Tingwei Zhang
2024-11-30 3:59 ` Bjorn Andersson
2024-12-02 10:31 ` Tingwei Zhang
2024-12-13 8:15 ` Song Xue [this message]
2025-01-27 4:23 ` Song Xue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0a16d52c-eebe-40da-ba02-7f68a7849039@quicinc.com \
--to=quic_songxue@quicinc.com \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@quicinc.com \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mgautam@codeaurora.org \
--cc=vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox