From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adrian Hunter Subject: Re: [PATCH RFCv2 01/10] mmc: core: Add support to read command queue parameters Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 12:31:54 +0200 Message-ID: <0cf555d9-4e79-73fb-954d-8f022c90d4dc@intel.com> References: <1467033757-32498-1-git-send-email-riteshh@codeaurora.org> <1467033757-32498-2-git-send-email-riteshh@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-mmc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Ritesh Harjani , Ulf Hansson , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , Alex Lemberg , mateusz.nowak@intel.com, Yuliy.Izrailov@sandisk.com, Jaehoon Chung , Dong Aisheng , Asutosh Das , Zhangfei Gao , kdorfman@codeaurora.org, David Griego , Sahitya Tummala , venkatg@codeaurora.org, Shawn Lin , Subhash Jadavani List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On 22/11/16 12:20, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 8:58 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote: >> On 21/11/16 17:34, Linus Walleij wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Ritesh Harjani wrote: >>> >>>> From: Asutosh Das >>>> >>>> eMMC cards with EXT_CSD version >= 8, optionally support command >>>> queuing feature as defined by JEDEC eMMC5.1. Add support for probing >>>> command queue feature for such type of cards. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Sujit Reddy Thumma >>>> Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das >>>> Signed-off-by: Venkat Gopalakrishnan >>>> [subhashj@codeaurora.org: fixed trivial merge conflicts] >>>> Signed-off-by: Subhash Jadavani >>>> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij >>> >>> Even if we don't merge the specific mechanism provided by the >>> rest of the patches, this patch just make us know more about >>> the capabilities of the hardware we're running on, which is good. >> >> I think SW CMDQ is a better starting point: > > When I supplied the Reviewe-by, as stated below it I am not talking > about the patch set as a whole. I am talking about *this* patch. I should have been more explicit. SW CMDQ covers some of the same ground and has basically the same patch: https://marc.info/?l=linux-mmc&m=147729859922297&w=2 > > As you can see in my reply to 00/10 I have serious concerns about > this patchset overall. I didn't mean to imply otherwise.