Re: [PATCH 2/6] drm/msm/dpu: Drop unused num argument from relevant macros

[Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>]

On 23/06/2023 02:48, Ryan McCann wrote:
> Drop unused parameter "num" from VIG_SBLK_NOSCALE and DMA sub block
> macros. Update calls to relevant macros to reflect change.

This is not relevant for this patchset.

With https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/534745/?series=116851&rev=2 
in place, VIG_SBLK and VIG_SBLK_ROT should also stop using num. But 
let's probably take another step forward and drop both arguments and use 
just a single instance of sblk per platform. I'll send a patch for it.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Ryan McCann <quic_rmccann@quicinc.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
>   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
> index 0de507d4d7b7..69200b4cf210 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_catalog.c
> @@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ static const uint32_t wb2_formats[] = {
>   	.rotation_cfg = rot_cfg, \
>   	}
>   
> -#define _DMA_SBLK(num, sdma_pri) \
> +#define _DMA_SBLK(sdma_pri) \
>   	{ \
>   	.maxdwnscale = SSPP_UNITY_SCALE, \
>   	.maxupscale = SSPP_UNITY_SCALE, \
> @@ -323,10 +323,10 @@ static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sdm845_vig_sblk_2 =
>   static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sdm845_vig_sblk_3 =
>   				_VIG_SBLK("3", 8, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED3);
>   
> -static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sdm845_dma_sblk_0 = _DMA_SBLK("8", 1);
> -static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sdm845_dma_sblk_1 = _DMA_SBLK("9", 2);
> -static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sdm845_dma_sblk_2 = _DMA_SBLK("10", 3);
> -static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sdm845_dma_sblk_3 = _DMA_SBLK("11", 4);
> +static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sdm845_dma_sblk_0 = _DMA_SBLK(1);
> +static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sdm845_dma_sblk_1 = _DMA_SBLK(2);
> +static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sdm845_dma_sblk_2 = _DMA_SBLK(3);
> +static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sdm845_dma_sblk_3 = _DMA_SBLK(4);
>   
>   #define SSPP_BLK(_name, _id, _base, _len, _features, \
>   		_sblk, _xinid, _type, _clkctrl) \
> @@ -365,11 +365,11 @@ static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sm8550_vig_sblk_1 =
>   static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sm8550_vig_sblk_2 =
>   				_VIG_SBLK("2", 9, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED4);
>   static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sm8550_vig_sblk_3 =
> -				_VIG_SBLK("3", 10, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED4);
> -static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sm8550_dma_sblk_4 = _DMA_SBLK("12", 5);
> -static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sm8550_dma_sblk_5 = _DMA_SBLK("13", 6);
> +				_VIG_SBLK(10, DPU_SSPP_SCALER_QSEED4);
> +static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sm8550_dma_sblk_4 = _DMA_SBLK(5);
> +static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sm8550_dma_sblk_5 = _DMA_SBLK(6);
>   
> -#define _VIG_SBLK_NOSCALE(num, sdma_pri) \
> +#define _VIG_SBLK_NOSCALE(sdma_pri) \
>   	{ \
>   	.maxdwnscale = SSPP_UNITY_SCALE, \
>   	.maxupscale = SSPP_UNITY_SCALE, \
> @@ -380,8 +380,8 @@ static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks sm8550_dma_sblk_5 = _DMA_SBLK("13", 6);
>   	.virt_num_formats = ARRAY_SIZE(plane_formats), \
>   	}
>   
> -static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks qcm2290_vig_sblk_0 = _VIG_SBLK_NOSCALE("0", 2);
> -static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks qcm2290_dma_sblk_0 = _DMA_SBLK("8", 1);
> +static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks qcm2290_vig_sblk_0 = _VIG_SBLK_NOSCALE(2);
> +static const struct dpu_sspp_sub_blks qcm2290_dma_sblk_0 = _DMA_SBLK(1);
>   
>   /*************************************************************
>    * MIXER sub blocks config
> 

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry