From: "Dwivedi, Avaneesh Kumar (avani)" <akdwived@codeaurora.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc: sboyd@codeaurora.org, agross@codeaurora.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v4 5/7] remoteproc: qcom: Modify reset sequence for hexagon to support v56 1.5.0
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 18:15:39 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0f3dbcbb-4ed5-dac8-a9c7-a22d597f4be5@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161209043510.GS30492@tuxbot>
On 12/9/2016 10:05 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Thu 24 Nov 02:00 PST 2016, Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi wrote:
>
>> This change introduces appropriate additional steps in reset sequence so
>> that hexagon v56 1.5.0 is brough out of reset.
>>
> You should use the non-_relaxed version throughout this patch, unless
> you have good reason not to.
OK.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi <akdwived@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c | 125 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 104 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c
>> index c55dc9a..7ea2f53 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pil.c
>> @@ -65,6 +65,8 @@
>> #define QDSP6SS_RESET_REG 0x014
>> #define QDSP6SS_GFMUX_CTL_REG 0x020
>> #define QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG 0x030
>> +#define QDSP6SS_MEM_PWR_CTL 0x0B0
>> +#define QDSP6SS_STRAP_ACC 0x110
>>
>> /* AXI Halt Register Offsets */
>> #define AXI_HALTREQ_REG 0x0
>> @@ -93,6 +95,15 @@
>> #define QDSS_BHS_ON BIT(21)
>> #define QDSS_LDO_BYP BIT(22)
>>
>> +/* QDSP6v56 parameters */
>> +#define QDSP6v56_LDO_BYP BIT(25)
>> +#define QDSP6v56_BHS_ON BIT(24)
>> +#define QDSP6v56_CLAMP_WL BIT(21)
>> +#define QDSP6v56_CLAMP_QMC_MEM BIT(22)
>> +#define HALT_CHECK_MAX_LOOPS (200)
>> +#define QDSP6SS_XO_CBCR (0x0038)
> Please drop these parenthesis.
OK.
>
>> +#define QDSP6SS_ACC_OVERRIDE_VAL 0x20
>> +
>> struct rproc_hexagon_res {
>> char *hexagon_mba_image;
>> char **proxy_reg_string;
>> @@ -147,6 +158,8 @@ struct q6v5 {
>> phys_addr_t mpss_reloc;
>> void *mpss_region;
>> size_t mpss_size;
>> +
>> + int hexagon_ver;
>> };
>>
>> enum {
>> @@ -388,35 +401,103 @@ static int q6v5_rmb_mba_wait(struct q6v5 *qproc, u32 status, int ms)
>>
>> static int q6v5proc_reset(struct q6v5 *qproc)
>> {
>> - u32 val;
>> - int ret;
>> + u64 val;
>> + int ret, i, count;
> One variable per line, sorted descending by length, please.
OK.
>
>> +
>> + /* Override the ACC value if required */
>> + if (qproc->hexagon_ver & 0x2)
> This will break when we reach the 6th version, compare (==) with the
> related enum.
OK.
>
>> + writel_relaxed(QDSP6SS_ACC_OVERRIDE_VAL,
>> + qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_STRAP_ACC);
>>
>> /* Assert resets, stop core */
>> val = readl(qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_RESET_REG);
>> val |= (Q6SS_CORE_ARES | Q6SS_BUS_ARES_ENABLE | Q6SS_STOP_CORE);
>> writel(val, qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_RESET_REG);
>>
>> + /* BHS require xo cbcr to be enabled */
> This comment goes inside the if-statement.
OK.
>
>> + if (qproc->hexagon_ver & 0x2) {
> ==
>
>> + val = readl_relaxed(qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_XO_CBCR);
>> + val |= 0x1;
>> + writel_relaxed(val, qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_XO_CBCR);
> Replace the rest of this block with:
>
> ret = readl_poll_timeout(qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_XO_CBCR,
> val, !(val & BIT(31)), 1, 200);
OK.
>
>> + for (count = HALT_CHECK_MAX_LOOPS; count > 0; count--) {
>> + val = readl_relaxed(qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_XO_CBCR);
>> + if (!(val & BIT(31)))
>> + break;
>> + udelay(1);
>> + }
>> +
>> + val = readl_relaxed(qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_XO_CBCR);
>> + if ((val & BIT(31)))
>> + dev_err(qproc->dev, "Failed to enable xo branch clock.\n");
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (qproc->hexagon_ver & 0x2) {
> ==
>
>> /* Enable power block headswitch, and wait for it to stabilize */
>> - val = readl(qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
>> - val |= QDSS_BHS_ON | QDSS_LDO_BYP;
>> - writel(val, qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
>> - udelay(1);
>> -
>> - /*
>> - * Turn on memories. L2 banks should be done individually
>> - * to minimize inrush current.
>> - */
>> - val = readl(qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
>> - val |= Q6SS_SLP_RET_N | Q6SS_L2TAG_SLP_NRET_N |
>> - Q6SS_ETB_SLP_NRET_N | Q6SS_L2DATA_STBY_N;
>> - writel(val, qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
>> - val |= Q6SS_L2DATA_SLP_NRET_N_2;
>> - writel(val, qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
>> - val |= Q6SS_L2DATA_SLP_NRET_N_1;
>> - writel(val, qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
>> - val |= Q6SS_L2DATA_SLP_NRET_N_0;
>> - writel(val, qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
>> + val = readl_relaxed(qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
> Use non-relaxed version of readl and writel, please.
OK.
>
>> + val |= QDSP6v56_BHS_ON;
>> + writel_relaxed(val, qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
>> + udelay(1);
> Please add a short comment on why this delay is needed.
I think there is a comment that
/* Enable power block headswitch, and wait for it to stabilize */
so block head switch need stabilization after enabling so 1 us delay,
before LDO being put in bypass mode.
>
>>
>> + /* Put LDO in bypass mode */
>> + val |= QDSP6v56_LDO_BYP;
>> + writel_relaxed(val, qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
>> +
> Remove empty line
ok.
>
>> + } else {
>> + /*
>> + * Enable power block headswitch,
>> + * and wait for it to stabilize
>> + */
>> + val = readl(qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
>> + val |= QDSS_BHS_ON | QDSS_LDO_BYP;
>> + writel(val, qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
>> + udelay(1);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (qproc->hexagon_ver & 0x2) {
> Why do you have:
>
> if (ver == 2) {
> ...
> }
>
> if (ver == 2) {
> ...
> } else {
> ...
> }
>
> if (ver == 2) {
> ...
> } else {
> ...
> }
>
> As far as I can see you should be able to merge those into one if/else.
wanted to utilize little piece of common code so put different if block.
OK will combine them.
>
>> + /*
>> + * Deassert QDSP6 compiler memory clamp
>> + */
>> + val = readl_relaxed(qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
>> + val &= ~QDSP6v56_CLAMP_QMC_MEM;
>> + writel_relaxed(val, qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
>> +
>> + /* Deassert memory peripheral sleep and L2 memory standby */
>> + val |= (Q6SS_L2DATA_STBY_N | Q6SS_SLP_RET_N);
>> + writel_relaxed(val, qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
>> +
>> + /* Turn on L1, L2, ETB and JU memories 1 at a time */
>> + val = readl_relaxed(qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_MEM_PWR_CTL);
>> + for (i = 19; i >= 0; i--) {
>> + val |= BIT(i);
>> + writel_relaxed(val, qproc->reg_base +
>> + QDSP6SS_MEM_PWR_CTL);
>> + /*
>> + * Wait for 1us for both memory peripheral and
>> + * data array to turn on.
>> + */
>> + mb();
> mb() ensures that your writes are ordered, it does not ensure that the
> write is done before the sleep. What is the actual requirement here?
As in comment, order of turning need to be serialized so this memory
barrier.
Do u think its not required?
>> + udelay(1);
>> + }
>> + /* Remove word line clamp */
>> + val = readl_relaxed(qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
>> + val &= ~QDSP6v56_CLAMP_WL;
>> + writel_relaxed(val, qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
>> + } else {
>> + /*
>> + * Turn on memories. L2 banks should be done individually
>> + * to minimize inrush current.
>> + */
>> + val = readl(qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
>> + val |= Q6SS_SLP_RET_N | Q6SS_L2TAG_SLP_NRET_N |
>> + Q6SS_ETB_SLP_NRET_N | Q6SS_L2DATA_STBY_N;
>> + writel(val, qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
>> + val |= Q6SS_L2DATA_SLP_NRET_N_2;
>> + writel(val, qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
>> + val |= Q6SS_L2DATA_SLP_NRET_N_1;
>> + writel(val, qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
>> + val |= Q6SS_L2DATA_SLP_NRET_N_0;
>> + writel(val, qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
>> + }
>> /* Remove IO clamp */
>> val &= ~Q6SS_CLAMP_IO;
>> writel(val, qproc->reg_base + QDSP6SS_PWR_CTL_REG);
> Regards,
> Bjorn
--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-12 12:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-24 10:00 [RESEND PATCH v4 0/7]remoteproc: qcom: Add support to hexagon v56 1.5.0 in qcom hexagon rproc driver Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi
2016-11-24 10:00 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 1/7] remoteproc: qcom: Add and initialize private data for hexagon dsp Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi
2016-12-08 21:37 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-12-09 11:42 ` Dwivedi, Avaneesh Kumar (avani)
2016-12-09 19:32 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-11-24 10:00 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 2/7] remoteproc: qcom: Initialize proxy and active clock's and regulator's Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi
2016-12-09 2:36 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-12-09 15:53 ` Dwivedi, Avaneesh Kumar (avani)
2016-11-24 10:00 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 3/7] remoteproc: qcom: Modify regulator enable and disable interface Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi
2016-12-09 2:44 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-12-12 8:21 ` Dwivedi, Avaneesh Kumar (avani)
2016-11-24 10:00 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 4/7] remoteproc: qcom: Modify clock enable and disable routine Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi
2016-12-09 2:57 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-12-12 8:23 ` Dwivedi, Avaneesh Kumar (avani)
2016-11-24 10:00 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 5/7] remoteproc: qcom: Modify reset sequence for hexagon to support v56 1.5.0 Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi
2016-12-09 4:35 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-12-12 12:45 ` Dwivedi, Avaneesh Kumar (avani) [this message]
2016-12-13 18:09 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-12-13 19:45 ` Dwivedi, Avaneesh Kumar (avani)
2016-12-13 22:07 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-12-14 15:50 ` Dwivedi, Avaneesh Kumar (avani)
2016-12-14 20:13 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-11-24 10:00 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 6/7] remoteproc: qcom: Modify stop routine to limit MX current for v56 1.5 Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi
2016-12-09 4:42 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-12-12 13:04 ` Dwivedi, Avaneesh Kumar (avani)
2016-11-24 10:00 ` [RESEND PATCH v4 7/7] clk: qcom: Add GCC_MSS_RESET support to reset MSS in v56 1.5.0 Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi
2016-12-08 19:51 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-12-12 13:05 ` Dwivedi, Avaneesh Kumar (avani)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0f3dbcbb-4ed5-dac8-a9c7-a22d597f4be5@codeaurora.org \
--to=akdwived@codeaurora.org \
--cc=agross@codeaurora.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).