Linux ARM-MSM sub-architecture
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>,
	Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
	freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>,
	Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
	Jeykumar Sankaran <jsanka@codeaurora.org>,
	Jordan Crouse <jordan@cosmicpenguin.net>,
	Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
	Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
	Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	cocci@inria.fr, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND] drm/msm/dpu: Delete a variable initialisation before a null pointer check in two functions
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 09:15:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <12050afd-ab60-4bac-bd25-0c3cc925b38b@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <29b32b0d-312d-4848-9e26-9e5e76e527a7@stanley.mountain>

>>> The address of a data structure member was determined before
>>> a corresponding null pointer check in the implementation of
>>> the functions “dpu_hw_pp_enable_te” and “dpu_hw_pp_get_vsync_info”.
>>>
>>> Thus avoid the risk for undefined behaviour by removing extra
>>> initialisations for the variable “c” (also because it was already
>>> reassigned with the same value behind this pointer check).
>
> There is no undefined behavior here.
Will any software development concerns evolve further also according to
undesirable null pointer dereferences?
https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/confluence/display/c/EXP34-C.+Do+not+dereference+null+pointers

Regards,
Markus

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-03  8:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <40c60719-4bfe-b1a4-ead7-724b84637f55@web.de>
     [not found] ` <1a11455f-ab57-dce0-1677-6beb8492a257@web.de>
     [not found]   ` <13566308-9a80-e4aa-f64e-978c02b1406d@web.de>
2023-04-11 16:43     ` [PATCH] drm/msm/dpu: Delete a variable initialisation before a null pointer check in two functions Dmitry Baryshkov
2023-04-11 16:44     ` Abhinav Kumar
2025-03-02 20:56     ` [PATCH RESEND] " Markus Elfring
2025-03-02 23:01       ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-03-03  7:14         ` Dan Carpenter
2025-03-03  8:15           ` Markus Elfring [this message]
2025-03-03  8:24             ` [RESEND] " Dan Carpenter
2025-03-05  8:40           ` [RFC] Clarification for “undefined behaviour”? Markus Elfring
2025-03-05  8:51             ` Dan Carpenter
2025-03-05  9:20               ` Markus Elfring
2025-03-05 14:17               ` David Laight
2025-03-05 14:30                 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-03-05 21:35                   ` David Laight

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=12050afd-ab60-4bac-bd25-0c3cc925b38b@web.de \
    --to=markus.elfring@web.de \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=architt@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=cocci@inria.fr \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jordan@cosmicpenguin.net \
    --cc=jsanka@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marijn.suijten@somainline.org \
    --cc=quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com \
    --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
    --cc=sean@poorly.run \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox