From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org>
To: Dima Zavin <dima@android.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, zpfeffer@quicinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] arm: msm: smd: fix SMD modem processor sync condition
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:42:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1271706152.15004.26.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <q2u404ea8001004191223rb8da1409pae25267a0667d20a@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2010-04-19 at 12:23 -0700, Dima Zavin wrote:
> But smd_core_init is already waiting for smd to be up. It waits for
> SMEM_SMSM_SHARED_STATE to be published. What does proc_comm have to do
> with it except for the fact that PCOM_READY gets set relatively late
> in the modem boot? If the shared state infrastructure is not yet
> initialized, it shouldn't be publishing it. Otherwise, you are just
> overloading PCOM_READY and again masking issues. Especially when we
> move to chips that don't need proc_comm for most things, and 7x30 is
> one of them where we get a lot of local clock control, it really seems
> wrong to wait for proc_comm to be up.
>
> You mentioned that this change will prevent some random crashes. Have
> you traced them down to what exactly is failing?
I traced the failures down to SMD failing to get initialized .. Be aware
that I'm using this version of SMD, but not a Google kernel. My kernel
has most of the drivers stripped away, with only SMD and MMC and a few
other things.
I've spoken with our SMD expert on this side, and waiting for PCOM_READY
appears to be the right thing to do here.. As for SMEM_SMSM_SHARED_STATE
I don't know, it's possible it's part of the modem simply not being
ready for input from SMD.. I can ask around on this side why that isn't
getting set or checked properly.
Even if this is a defect in the modem we still need to formalize this
check since this problem exists in released phones (like trout where I
found it).
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-19 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-19 18:03 [PATCH 5/5] arm: msm: smd: fix SMD modem processor sync condition Daniel Walker
2010-04-19 18:34 ` Dima Zavin
2010-04-19 19:01 ` Daniel Walker
2010-04-19 19:06 ` Dima Zavin
2010-04-19 19:11 ` Daniel Walker
2010-04-19 19:23 ` Dima Zavin
2010-04-19 19:42 ` Daniel Walker [this message]
2010-04-20 13:37 ` Pavel Machek
2010-04-20 15:44 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Walker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1271706152.15004.26.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com \
--to=dwalker@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dima@android.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zpfeffer@quicinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).