RE: QSD8250 illegal instruction

[Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org>]

On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 22:52 +0100, Lukas-David Gorris wrote:
> Quoting Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org>:
> 
> > I don't know of a QSD8250B SoC .. If there is one, I have no idea what
> > would be different.
> 
> Ok fine. So SoC revision seems like nothing to worry about.

Where are you getting the B distinction from ? something your getting
out of WinCE ?

> > It might be that the baseband processor is running different code
> > between the Nexus One and the Leo (i.e. different modem images), and
> > that code is programming the SoC differently between the two.
> 
> Yes, we do have a different modem image. The Leo AMSS version is for  
> WinCE. The device comes with windows mobile 6.5 installed.
> Can you think of anything specifically regarding different SoC  
> programming between different AMSS version? Some magic proc_comm to  
> send?
> 
> > Or it could be a bootloader thing, does the Leo have fastboot ?
> 
> We are using http://htc-linux.org/wiki/index.php?title=HaRET to boot  
> linux on Leo. So at boot time, all the hardware is initialized already  
> by WinCE.

Ok .. I suppose there could be something different between what WinCE
expects, and what Linux expect. Do you know if this method has been used
successfully on other HTC phones with Qualcomm SoC's ?

Daniel