From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>,
Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] [ARM] Allow machines to override __delay()
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 10:29:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1286299778.18791.18.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1285644827-6846-3-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org>
On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 20:33 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Some machines want to implement their own __delay() routine based
> on fixed timers. Expose functionality to set the __delay()
> routine at runtime. This should allow two machines with different
> __delay() routines to happily co-exist within the same kernel
> with minimal overhead.
Say "This allows developers to implement their own __delay() ..."
> Russell expressed concern that using a timer based __delay()
> would cause problems where an iomapped device isn't mapped in
> before a delay call was made (see
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/78543 for
> more info). We can sidestep that issue with this approach since
> the __delay() routine _should_ only be pointed to a timer based
> delay once the timer has been properly mapped. Up until that
> point __delay() and udelay() will use delay_loop() which is
> always safe to call.
>
> This patch is inspired by x86's delay.c
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> Reviewed-by: Saravana Kannan <skannan@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/delay.h | 2 ++
> arch/arm/lib/delay.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/delay.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/delay.h
> index ccc5ed5..7c732b5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/delay.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/delay.h
> @@ -40,5 +40,7 @@ extern void __const_udelay(unsigned long);
> __const_udelay((n) * ((2199023U*HZ)>>11))) : \
> __udelay(n))
>
> +extern void set_delay_fn(void (*fn)(unsigned long));
> +
> #endif /* defined(_ARM_DELAY_H) */
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/delay.c b/arch/arm/lib/delay.c
> index 5ee0adc..b307fcc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/lib/delay.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/lib/delay.c
> @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
> *
> * Copyright (C) 1995, 1996 Russell King
> * Copyright (c) 2010, Code Aurora Forum. All rights reserved.
> + * Copyright (C) 1993 Linus Torvalds
> + * Copyright (C) 1997 Martin Mares <mj@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Who is Martin Mares? Why are you adding these?
Daniel
--
Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-05 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-28 3:33 [PATCH 0/3] Fixing udelay() on SMP (and non-SMP too) Stephen Boyd
2010-09-28 3:33 ` [PATCH 1/3] [ARM] Translate delay.S into (mostly) C Stephen Boyd
2010-10-05 17:22 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-06 3:36 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-10-06 13:38 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-06 14:26 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-10-06 18:30 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-10-06 19:35 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-06 20:05 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-10-08 0:11 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-10-08 1:12 ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-10-06 20:24 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-09-28 3:33 ` [PATCH 2/3] [ARM] Allow machines to override __delay() Stephen Boyd
2010-10-05 17:29 ` Daniel Walker [this message]
2010-10-06 3:36 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-09-28 3:33 ` [PATCH 3/3] [ARM] Implement a timer based __delay() loop Stephen Boyd
2010-10-05 17:38 ` Daniel Walker
2010-10-06 3:36 ` Stephen Boyd
2010-10-06 13:44 ` Daniel Walker
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-09-07 18:23 [PATCH 0/3] Fixing udelay() on SMP (and non-SMP too) Stephen Boyd
2010-09-07 18:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] [ARM] Allow machines to override __delay() Stephen Boyd
2010-09-04 4:28 [PATCH 0/3] Fixing udelay() on SMP (and non-SMP too) Stephen Boyd
2010-09-04 4:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] [ARM] Allow machines to override __delay() Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1286299778.18791.18.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com \
--to=dwalker@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ccross@android.com \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=skannan@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).