From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ns1.siteground211.com ([209.62.36.12]:41475 "EHLO serv01.siteground211.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756960Ab0KJWCl (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Nov 2010 17:02:41 -0500 Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH v3 0/4] usb: Add SuperSpeed support to the Gadget Framework From: Felipe Balbi In-Reply-To: <901781.51424.qm@web180310.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <901781.51424.qm@web180310.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 23:39:51 +0200 Message-ID: <1289425191.19463.0.camel@eowin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: David Brownell Cc: Daniel Walker , tlinder@codeaurora.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 12:15 -0800, David Brownell wrote: > Original $SUBJECT was "[RFC/PATCH 1/2] Add usb_endpoint_descriptor to be part of the struct usb_ep" dated Wednesday, October 6, 2010, 9:34 PM > and with a long CC list (that included the MSM > list that allegedly didn't receive it). That info > may help sort out where the email went astray, if > we assume that's why it got no response. you mean this [1] [1] http://marc.info/?t=128612384500006&r=1&w=2 -- balbi