From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Nexus One Support
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 16:03:13 -0800
Message-ID: <1295654593.22882.9.camel@m0nster>
References: <1295576730.4096.24.camel@Joe-Laptop>
	 <1295624801.19880.13.camel@m0nster>
	 <20110121094827.41818a55@jbarnes-desktop>
	 <20110121095658.1ab623fe@jbarnes-desktop>
	 <1295632828.19880.22.camel@m0nster>
	 <20110121100441.06a94482@jbarnes-desktop>
	 <1295633882.19880.31.camel@m0nster>
	 <AANLkTi=L+MW5-KLP_TKSxhstD8JEtBW=RKci5wSbZsd6@mail.gmail.com>
	 <1295642995.19880.42.camel@m0nster>
	 <AANLkTikVDn+W8t7KSym5tCGZowyYvoLFrk8d0mumiRF-@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20110121234930.GK3043@thunk.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]:16535 "EHLO
	wolverine01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754489Ab1AVADM (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 21 Jan 2011 19:03:12 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20110121234930.GK3043@thunk.org>
Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
To: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>, Dima Zavin <dmitriyz@google.com>, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davidb@codeaurora.org

On Fri, 2011-01-21 at 18:49 -0500, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 11:05:54PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:49 PM, Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> > > I'll add this list into the commit text ..
> > 
> > So why is everyone bitching at Daniel when he's doing something the
> > Android folks should have done themselves a long time ago?
> 
> Two wrongs don't make a right.  And it's not like not submitting
> changes is wrong, although granted it's not ideal.  (I'd say removing
> attribution from a git commit is even worse.  If you're doing the
> equivalent of a cherry pick, you should preserve the Author field.

right, but it wasn't a cherrypick which was explain in the thread. So
there's no wrongs here ..

Daniel

-- 
Sent by an consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum.