From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Walker Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/11] msm: Generalize timer register mappings Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:57:56 -0800 Message-ID: <1295909876.29639.69.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> References: <1292384961-8851-1-git-send-email-stepanm@codeaurora.org> <1295468747-22796-1-git-send-email-davidb@codeaurora.org> <1295468747-22796-3-git-send-email-davidb@codeaurora.org> <1295908604.29639.62.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com> <8yaei81kjlc.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.254]:5742 "EHLO wolverine01.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752960Ab1AXW6Y (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:58:24 -0500 In-Reply-To: <8yaei81kjlc.fsf@huya.qualcomm.com> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: David Brown Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 14:44 -0800, David Brown wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24 2011, Daniel Walker wrote: > > > On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:25 -0800, David Brown wrote: > >> + int global_offset = 0; > >> + > >> + if (cpu_is_msm7x01()) { > >> + msm_clocks[MSM_CLOCK_GPT].regbase = MSM_CSR_BASE; > >> + msm_clocks[MSM_CLOCK_DGT].regbase = MSM_CSR_BASE + 0x10; > >> + } else if (cpu_is_msm7x30()) { > >> + msm_clocks[MSM_CLOCK_GPT].regbase = MSM_CSR_BASE + 0x04; > >> + msm_clocks[MSM_CLOCK_DGT].regbase = MSM_CSR_BASE + 0x24; > >> + } else if (cpu_is_qsd8x50()) { > >> + msm_clocks[MSM_CLOCK_GPT].regbase = MSM_CSR_BASE; > >> + msm_clocks[MSM_CLOCK_DGT].regbase = MSM_CSR_BASE + 0x10; > >> + } else if (cpu_is_msm8x60()) { > >> + msm_clocks[MSM_CLOCK_GPT].regbase = MSM_TMR_BASE + 0x04; > >> + msm_clocks[MSM_CLOCK_DGT].regbase = MSM_TMR_BASE + 0x24; > >> + > >> + /* Use CPU0's timer as the global timer. */ > >> + global_offset = MSM_TMR0_BASE - MSM_TMR_BASE; > >> + } else > >> + BUG(); > > > > Ifdef's here would be OK I think, your already using the "runtime" > > checks .. > > The point of the change is to get rid of the ifdefs so that we can > dynamically detect which target we are on. Yes, there are other places > where it doesn't work, but we'll get there gradually. I'm not suggesting you do something you can't do right now .. For instance you could make, #define MSM_MSM7XXX_DGT_BASE (MSM_TMR_BASE + 0x10) and use that instead of what you have above. Daniel -- Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.