From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Fix SMP_ON_UP for non ARM ltd. implementations
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 15:04:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1296083052-20034-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> (raw)
The SMP_ON_UP checks restrict the feature to ARM limited designs,
when other implementers support SMP designs. Instead of checking
for an ARM CPU and ARMv6/v7 just check for a v6 or v7 and then
rely on the MPIDR for non ARM 11MPCore designs.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
---
arch/arm/kernel/head.S | 13 +++++++++----
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/head.S b/arch/arm/kernel/head.S
index f17d9a0..ede5b70 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/head.S
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/head.S
@@ -393,20 +393,25 @@ ENDPROC(__turn_mmu_on)
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP_ON_UP
__fixup_smp:
mov r4, #0x00070000
- orr r3, r4, #0xff000000 @ mask 0xff070000
- orr r4, r4, #0x41000000 @ val 0x41070000
- and r0, r9, r3
- teq r0, r4 @ ARM CPU and ARMv6/v7?
+ and r0, r9, r4
+ teq r0, r4 @ ARMv6/v7?
bne __fixup_smp_on_up @ no, assume UP
+ orr r3, r4, #0xff000000 @ mask 0xff070000
orr r3, r3, #0x0000ff00
orr r3, r3, #0x000000f0 @ mask 0xff07fff0
+ orr r4, r4, #0x41000000 @ val 0x41070000
orr r4, r4, #0x0000b000
orr r4, r4, #0x00000020 @ val 0x4107b020
and r0, r9, r3
teq r0, r4 @ ARM 11MPCore?
moveq pc, lr @ yes, assume SMP
+ mov r4, #0x00070000
+ and r0, r9, #0x000f0000
+ teq r0, r4 @ ARMv6?
+ beq __fixup_smp_on_up @ yes, assume UP
+
mrc p15, 0, r0, c0, c0, 5 @ read MPIDR
tst r0, #1 << 31
movne pc, lr @ bit 31 => SMP
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
next reply other threads:[~2011-01-26 23:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-26 23:04 Stephen Boyd [this message]
2011-01-30 12:20 ` [PATCH] ARM: Fix SMP_ON_UP for non ARM ltd. implementations Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-30 16:27 ` Will Deacon
2011-01-30 16:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-31 10:32 ` Will Deacon
2011-01-31 21:33 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1296083052-20034-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).