* [PATCH v1] mmc: card: fixing an false identification of SANITIZE command
@ 2013-06-05 11:13 Yaniv Gardi
2013-06-27 15:28 ` Chris Ball
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Yaniv Gardi @ 2013-06-05 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mmc; +Cc: linux-arm-msm, ygardi, open list
Inside the routine mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd() the sanitize command is
identified according to the value of bits 16-23 of the argument.
but what happens if a different command is sent, and only by chance,
bits 16-23 contain the value of SANITIZE command ?
In that case a SANITIZE command will be falsely identified.
In order to prevent such a case, the condition is expanded and
now it also checks the opcode itself, and verifies that it is an
MMC_SWITCH opcode.
Signed-off-by: Yaniv Gardi <ygardi@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
index c900d28..9775ae7 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
@@ -542,7 +542,9 @@ static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
goto cmd_rel_host;
}
- if (MMC_EXTRACT_INDEX_FROM_ARG(cmd.arg) == EXT_CSD_SANITIZE_START) {
+ if ((MMC_EXTRACT_INDEX_FROM_ARG(cmd.arg) == EXT_CSD_SANITIZE_START) &&
+ (cmd.opcode == MMC_SWITCH)) {
+
err = ioctl_do_sanitize(card);
if (err)
--
1.7.6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1] mmc: card: fixing an false identification of SANITIZE command
2013-06-05 11:13 [PATCH v1] mmc: card: fixing an false identification of SANITIZE command Yaniv Gardi
@ 2013-06-27 15:28 ` Chris Ball
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Chris Ball @ 2013-06-27 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yaniv Gardi; +Cc: linux-mmc, linux-arm-msm, open list
Hi Yaniv,
On Wed, Jun 05 2013, Yaniv Gardi wrote:
> Inside the routine mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd() the sanitize command is
> identified according to the value of bits 16-23 of the argument.
>
> but what happens if a different command is sent, and only by chance,
> bits 16-23 contain the value of SANITIZE command ?
> In that case a SANITIZE command will be falsely identified.
> In order to prevent such a case, the condition is expanded and
> now it also checks the opcode itself, and verifies that it is an
> MMC_SWITCH opcode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yaniv Gardi <ygardi@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 4 +++-
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
> index c900d28..9775ae7 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
> @@ -542,7 +542,9 @@ static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev,
> goto cmd_rel_host;
> }
>
> - if (MMC_EXTRACT_INDEX_FROM_ARG(cmd.arg) == EXT_CSD_SANITIZE_START) {
> + if ((MMC_EXTRACT_INDEX_FROM_ARG(cmd.arg) == EXT_CSD_SANITIZE_START) &&
> + (cmd.opcode == MMC_SWITCH)) {
> +
> err = ioctl_do_sanitize(card);
>
> if (err)
Thanks, pushed to mmc-next for 3.11.
- Chris.
--
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-06-27 15:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-06-05 11:13 [PATCH v1] mmc: card: fixing an false identification of SANITIZE command Yaniv Gardi
2013-06-27 15:28 ` Chris Ball
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).