From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yaniv Gardi Subject: [PATCH v1] mmc: card: fixing an false identification of SANITIZE command Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 14:13:08 +0300 Message-ID: <1370430804-5663-1-git-send-email-ygardi@codeaurora.org> Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.11.231]:36323 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751803Ab3FELNh (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jun 2013 07:13:37 -0400 Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, ygardi@codeaurora.org, open list Inside the routine mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd() the sanitize command is identified according to the value of bits 16-23 of the argument. but what happens if a different command is sent, and only by chance, bits 16-23 contain the value of SANITIZE command ? In that case a SANITIZE command will be falsely identified. In order to prevent such a case, the condition is expanded and now it also checks the opcode itself, and verifies that it is an MMC_SWITCH opcode. Signed-off-by: Yaniv Gardi --- drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 4 +++- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c index c900d28..9775ae7 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c @@ -542,7 +542,9 @@ static int mmc_blk_ioctl_cmd(struct block_device *bdev, goto cmd_rel_host; } - if (MMC_EXTRACT_INDEX_FROM_ARG(cmd.arg) == EXT_CSD_SANITIZE_START) { + if ((MMC_EXTRACT_INDEX_FROM_ARG(cmd.arg) == EXT_CSD_SANITIZE_START) && + (cmd.opcode == MMC_SWITCH)) { + err = ioctl_do_sanitize(card); if (err) -- 1.7.6