From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Bolle Subject: Re: drm/msm: CONFIG_MSM_OCMEM? Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:00:02 +0100 Message-ID: <1392148802.9682.36.camel@x220> References: <1392133181.3755.14.camel@x220> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org To: Rob Clark Cc: Richard Weinberger , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org" , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 12:29 -0500, Rob Clark wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Paul Bolle wrote: > > Commit 55459968176f ("drm/msm: add a330/apq8x74") added preprocessor > > checks for CONFIG_MSM_OCMEM. But I couldn't find a Kconfig symbol > > MSM_OCMEM (nor a preprocessor define for a macro of that name). Why were > > those preprocessor checks added? > > At the moment, CONFIG_MSM_OCMEM is only in downstream kernel.. not > 100% sure about how we'll handle that upstream when there is more than > just drm/msm using OCMEM (which can be shared between gpu, video > enc/dec, etc). I see. (Wouldn't that be an upstream kernel, actually?) > > Please note that lines 197-201 currently read: > > /* Set the OCMEM base address for A330, etc */ > > if (a3xx_gpu->ocmem_hdl) { > > gpu_write(gpu, REG_A3XX_RB_GMEM_BASE_ADDR, > > (unsigned int)(a3xx_gpu->ocmem_base >> 14)); > > } > > > > ocmem_hdl and ocmem_base are used uninitialized here, aren't they? So it > > seems these lines should be wrapped with a preprocessor check for > > CONFIG_MSM_OCMEM too. > > in this case ocmem_hdl will be NULL (since a3xx_gpu is kzalloc'd). > The #ifdef's could be added here, but not required. I missed that. So whether or not to #ifdef this would be mostly a matter of style. Thanks, Paul Bolle