From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Bolle Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] firmware: qcom: scm: Add support for ARM64 SoCs Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 23:09:46 +0200 Message-ID: <1429045786.27492.51.camel@x220> References: <1429041520-6720-1-git-send-email-galak@codeaurora.org> <1429041520-6720-3-git-send-email-galak@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1429041520-6720-3-git-send-email-galak@codeaurora.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Kumar Gala Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, abhimany@codeaurora.org, will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arm@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2015-04-14 at 14:58 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > --- a/drivers/firmware/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/firmware/Makefile > +ifdef CONFIG_64BIT > +obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_SCM) += qcom_scm-64.o > +else > obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_SCM) += qcom_scm-32.o > +endif I don't think arm and arm64 set BITS. If they did obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_SCM) += qcom_scm-$(BITS).o might have worked here. Paul Bolle