linux-arm-msm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
To: kishon@ti.com, jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, vinholikatti@gmail.com,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com
Cc: sboyd@codeaurora.org, subhashj@codeaurora.org,
	ygardi@codeaurora.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 02/12] phy: qcom-ufs: Use devm sibling of kstrdup for regulator names
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 01:52:04 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1477772534-14170-3-git-send-email-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1477772534-14170-1-git-send-email-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>

This helps us in avoiding any requirement for kfree() operation
to be called exclusively over the allocated string pointer.

Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>
---

No changes since v1.

 drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c | 5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c b/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c
index 455064c..5dc24d8 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static int __ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(struct phy *phy,
 
 	char prop_name[MAX_PROP_NAME];
 
-	vreg->name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
+	vreg->name = devm_kstrdup(dev, name, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!vreg->name) {
 		err = -ENOMEM;
 		goto out;
@@ -637,9 +637,6 @@ int ufs_qcom_phy_remove(struct phy *generic_phy,
 {
 	phy_power_off(generic_phy);
 
-	kfree(ufs_qcom_phy->vdda_pll.name);
-	kfree(ufs_qcom_phy->vdda_phy.name);
-
 	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufs_qcom_phy_remove);
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project


  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-10-29 20:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-29 20:22 [PATCH v3 00/12] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Clean up qcom-ufs phy and ufs-qcom hcd Vivek Gautam
2016-10-29 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] phy: qcom-ufs: Remove unnecessary BUG_ON Vivek Gautam
2016-10-29 20:22 ` Vivek Gautam [this message]
2016-10-29 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] phy: qcom-ufs: Cleanup clock and regulator initialization Vivek Gautam
2016-10-29 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] phy: qcom-ufs-14nm: Add new compatible for msm8996 based phy Vivek Gautam
2016-10-31 21:11   ` Subhash Jadavani
2016-11-03 17:07     ` Vivek Gautam
2016-11-04  6:09       ` Subhash Jadavani
2016-10-29 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] phy: qcom-ufs: Skip obtaining rx/tx_iface_clk " Vivek Gautam
2016-11-01 18:42   ` Subhash Jadavani
2016-11-04  6:11     ` Subhash Jadavani
2016-10-29 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] phy: qcom-ufs-qmp-xx: Discard remove callback for drivers Vivek Gautam
2016-10-29 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] phy: qcom-ufs: Remove unnecessary function declarations Vivek Gautam
2016-10-29 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] phy: qcom-ufs-qmp-xx: Move clock and regulator init out of phy init Vivek Gautam
2016-10-29 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Refactoring phy clock handling Vivek Gautam
2016-11-01 18:47   ` Subhash Jadavani
2016-11-02  7:34     ` Vivek Gautam
2016-11-03 17:30       ` [PATCH v4 " Vivek Gautam
2016-11-04  6:05         ` Subhash Jadavani
2016-11-04 16:29         ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-10-29 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] phy: qcom-ufs: Remove common layer phy exit callback Vivek Gautam
2016-10-29 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] scsi/ufs: qcom: Add phy_exit call in hcd exit path Vivek Gautam
2016-10-29 20:22 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] scsi/ufs: qcom: Don't free resource-managed kmalloc element Vivek Gautam
2016-10-31 21:14   ` Subhash Jadavani
2016-11-01 13:58 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Clean up qcom-ufs phy and ufs-qcom hcd Martin K. Petersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1477772534-14170-3-git-send-email-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org \
    --to=vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=subhashj@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=vinholikatti@gmail.com \
    --cc=ygardi@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).