From: Gaurav Kohli <gkohli@codeaurora.org>
To: peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
mingo@kernel.org, bigeasy@linutronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Gaurav Kohli <gkohli@codeaurora.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1] kthread/smpboot: Serialize kthread parking against wakeup
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2018 14:03:19 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1524645199-5596-1-git-send-email-gkohli@codeaurora.org> (raw)
The control cpu thread which initiates hotplug calls kthread_park()
for hotplug thread and sets KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK. After this control
thread wakes up the hotplug thread. There is a chance that wakeup
code sees the hotplug thread (running on AP core) in INTERRUPTIBLE
state, but sets its state to RUNNING after hotplug thread has entered
kthread_parkme() and changed its state to TASK_PARKED. This can result
in panic later on in kthread_unpark(), as it sees KTHREAD_IS_PARKED
flag set but fails to rebind the kthread, due to it being not in
TASK_PARKED state. Fix this, by serializing wakeup state change,
against state change before parking the kthread.
Below is the possible race:
Control thread Hotplug Thread
kthread_park()
set KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK
smpboot_thread_fn
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
kthread_parkme
wake_up_process()
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags);
if (!(p->state & state)) -> this will fail
goto out;
__kthread_parkme
__set_current_state(TASK_PARKED);
if (p->on_rq && ttwu_remote(p, wake_flags))
ttwu_remote()
p->state = TASK_RUNNING;
schedule();
So to avoid this race, take pi_lock to serial state changes.
Suggested-by: Pavankumar Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>
Co-developed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Gaurav Kohli <gkohli@codeaurora.org>
---
Changes since V1:
- Add comment to explain need of pi_lock.
diff --git a/kernel/smpboot.c b/kernel/smpboot.c
index 5043e74..c5c5184 100644
--- a/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -122,7 +122,45 @@ static int smpboot_thread_fn(void *data)
}
if (kthread_should_park()) {
+ /*
+ * Serialize against wakeup. If we take the lock first,
+ * wakeup is skipped. If we run later, we observe,
+ * TASK_RUNNING update from wakeup path, before moving
+ * forward. This helps avoid the race, where wakeup
+ * observes TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, and also observes
+ * the TASK_PARKED in kthread_parkme() before updating
+ * task state to TASK_RUNNING. In this case, kthread
+ * gets parked in TASK_RUNNING state. This results
+ * in panic later on in kthread_unpark(), as it sees
+ * KTHREAD_IS_PARKED flag set but fails to rebind the
+ * kthread, due to it being not in TASK_PARKED state.
+ *
+ * Control thread Hotplug Thread
+ *
+ * kthread_park()
+ * set KTHREAD_SHOULD_PARK
+ * smpboot_thread_fn()
+ * set_current_state(
+ * TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+ * kthread_parkme()
+ *
+ * wake_up_process()
+ *
+ * raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags);
+ * if (!(p->state & state)) __set_current_state(
+ * goto out; TASK_RUNNING);
+ *
+ * __set_current_state(
+ * TASK_PARKED);
+ *
+ * if (p->on_rq && ttwu_remote(p, wake_flags))
+ * ttwu_remote()
+ * p->state = TASK_RUNNING;
+ * schedule();
+ */
+ raw_spin_lock(¤t->pi_lock);
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
+ raw_spin_unlock(¤t->pi_lock);
preempt_enable();
if (ht->park && td->status == HP_THREAD_ACTIVE) {
BUG_ON(td->cpu != smp_processor_id());
--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
next reply other threads:[~2018-04-25 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-25 8:33 Gaurav Kohli [this message]
2018-04-25 20:09 ` [PATCH v1] kthread/smpboot: Serialize kthread parking against wakeup Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-26 4:04 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-04-26 9:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-26 8:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-26 8:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-26 15:53 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-04-30 11:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-01 7:50 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-05-01 10:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-01 10:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-01 10:40 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-05-01 11:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-01 11:46 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-05-01 13:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-02 5:15 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-05-02 8:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-02 10:13 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-05-07 11:09 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-05-07 11:23 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-06-05 11:13 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-06-05 15:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-06-05 15:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-05 15:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-05 16:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-06-05 18:21 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-06-05 20:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-06 13:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-06-06 15:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-06 15:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-06 15:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-06 18:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-07 8:30 ` Kohli, Gaurav
2018-05-01 10:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-26 16:02 ` Andrea Parri
2018-04-26 16:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-04-30 11:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-30 11:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-28 6:43 ` [lkp-robot] [kthread/smpboot] cad8e99675: inconsistent{IN-HARDIRQ-W}->{HARDIRQ-ON-W}usage kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1524645199-5596-1-git-send-email-gkohli@codeaurora.org \
--to=gkohli@codeaurora.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).