* [PATCH] cpu/hotplug: Fix acquire of st->should_run in cpuhp_thread_fun()
@ 2018-09-05 5:52 Neeraj Upadhyay
2018-09-05 8:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Neeraj Upadhyay @ 2018-09-05 5:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tglx, josh, peterz, mingo, jiangshanlai, dzickus, brendan.jackman,
malat, mojha
Cc: linux-kernel, sramana, linux-arm-msm, Neeraj Upadhyay
The smp_mb() in cpuhp_thread_fun() appears to be misplaced, and
need to be after the load of st->should_run, to prevent
reordering of the later load/stores w.r.t. the load of
st->should_run.
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
---
kernel/cpu.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
index aa7fe85..eb4041f 100644
--- a/kernel/cpu.c
+++ b/kernel/cpu.c
@@ -607,15 +607,15 @@ static void cpuhp_thread_fun(unsigned int cpu)
bool bringup = st->bringup;
enum cpuhp_state state;
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!st->should_run))
+ return;
+
/*
* ACQUIRE for the cpuhp_should_run() load of ->should_run. Ensures
* that if we see ->should_run we also see the rest of the state.
*/
smp_mb();
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!st->should_run))
- return;
-
cpuhp_lock_acquire(bringup);
if (st->single) {
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] cpu/hotplug: Fix acquire of st->should_run in cpuhp_thread_fun()
2018-09-05 5:52 [PATCH] cpu/hotplug: Fix acquire of st->should_run in cpuhp_thread_fun() Neeraj Upadhyay
@ 2018-09-05 8:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2018-09-05 8:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Neeraj Upadhyay
Cc: tglx, josh, mingo, jiangshanlai, dzickus, brendan.jackman, malat,
mojha, linux-kernel, sramana, linux-arm-msm
On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 11:22:07AM +0530, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote:
> The smp_mb() in cpuhp_thread_fun() appears to be misplaced, and
> need to be after the load of st->should_run, to prevent
> reordering of the later load/stores w.r.t. the load of
> st->should_run.
I'm tempted to say this changelog needs improvement, but given the
comment that goes with the smp_mb(), yes this is obviously right.
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infraded.org>
> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> kernel/cpu.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
> index aa7fe85..eb4041f 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -607,15 +607,15 @@ static void cpuhp_thread_fun(unsigned int cpu)
> bool bringup = st->bringup;
> enum cpuhp_state state;
>
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!st->should_run))
> + return;
> +
> /*
> * ACQUIRE for the cpuhp_should_run() load of ->should_run. Ensures
> * that if we see ->should_run we also see the rest of the state.
> */
> smp_mb();
>
> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!st->should_run))
> - return;
> -
> cpuhp_lock_acquire(bringup);
>
> if (st->single) {
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-09-05 8:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-09-05 5:52 [PATCH] cpu/hotplug: Fix acquire of st->should_run in cpuhp_thread_fun() Neeraj Upadhyay
2018-09-05 8:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).