Linux ARM-MSM sub-architecture
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+linux-arm-msm@kernel.org
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] cpufreq: Remove CPUFREQ_STICKY flag
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2021 19:59:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <161462878169.6187.18423897637050989539.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a59bb322b22c247d570b70a8e94067804287623b.1612241683.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Hello:

This patch was applied to qcom/linux.git (refs/heads/for-next):

On Tue,  2 Feb 2021 10:25:11 +0530 you wrote:
> During cpufreq driver's registration, if the ->init() callback for all
> the CPUs fail then there is not much point in keeping the driver around
> as it will only account for more of unnecessary noise, for example
> cpufreq core will try to suspend/resume the driver which never got
> registered properly.
> 
> The removal of such a driver is avoided if the driver carries the
> CPUFREQ_STICKY flag. This was added way back [1] in 2004 and perhaps no
> one should ever need it now. A lot of drivers do set this flag, probably
> because they just copied it from other drivers.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [V2] cpufreq: Remove CPUFREQ_STICKY flag
    https://git.kernel.org/qcom/c/5ae4a4b45d43

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-01 20:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-02  4:55 [PATCH V2] cpufreq: Remove CPUFREQ_STICKY flag Viresh Kumar
2021-02-04 18:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-01 19:59 ` patchwork-bot+linux-arm-msm [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=161462878169.6187.18423897637050989539.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+linux-arm-msm@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox