[PATCH v7 0/2] arm64: dts: qcom: add initial support for Samsung Galaxy S22

[PATCH v7 0/2] arm64: dts: qcom: add initial support for Samsung Galaxy S22

[Violet]

Changes in v7:
- Document the reserved GPIO pins, remove pin 50 as it does not
 need to be reserved
- Clarify the phone isn't limited to USB 2.0 but rather USB 3.0
 isn't implemented yet
- Add a newline before every 'status' node

Changes in v6:
- Remove debug features (bootargs, etc) that slipped in the v5 DTS
- Format and organize nodes correctly based on existing DTS, 
 move "status = "okay";" to the bottom always
- Solve "ddr_device_type" and "qcom,rmtfs-mem" warnings, the rest are
 from existing SoC .dtsi
- Disable buttons, ufs and other features for later revision

Changes in v5:
- Properly format the thread

Changes in v4:
- Try to properly format the thread

Changes in v3:
- Removed unnecessary initrd start and end addresses
- Make sure r0q is in right order on Makefile
- Properly format memory addresses
- Set r0q to the correct, alphabetical order in documents

Changes in v2:
- Attempt to format the patchset thread correctly

Signed-off-by: Violet <violet@atl.tools>

Violet (2):
  dt-bindings: arm: qcom: document r0q board binding
  arm64: dts: qcom: add initial support for Samsung Galaxy S22

 .../devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml         |   1 +
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile             |   1 +
 .../boot/dts/qcom/sm8450-samsung-r0q.dts      | 147 ++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 149 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450-samsung-r0q.dts

-- 
2.50.1

[PATCH v7 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: document r0q board binding

[Violet]

Add binding for the Samsung Galaxy S22 (SM-S901E) board, codenamed R0Q,
which is based on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SoC.

Signed-off-by: Violet <violet@atl.tools>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
index ae43b3556580..64455af6c44a 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
@@ -1095,6 +1095,7 @@ properties:
           - enum:
               - qcom,sm8450-hdk
               - qcom,sm8450-qrd
+              - samsung,r0q
               - sony,pdx223
               - sony,pdx224
           - const: qcom,sm8450
-- 
2.50.1

[PATCH v7 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: add initial support for Samsung Galaxy S22

[Violet]

Add new device support for the Samsung Galaxy S22 (SM-S901E) phone

What works:
- SimpleFB
- USB

Signed-off-by: Violet <violet@atl.tools>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile             |   1 +
 .../boot/dts/qcom/sm8450-samsung-r0q.dts      | 147 ++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 148 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450-samsung-r0q.dts

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile
index 4bfa926b6a08..790613cabd08 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile
@@ -287,6 +287,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)	+= sm8350-sony-xperia-sagami-pdx214.dtb
 dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)	+= sm8350-sony-xperia-sagami-pdx215.dtb
 dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)	+= sm8450-hdk.dtb
 dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)	+= sm8450-qrd.dtb
+dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)	+= sm8450-samsung-r0q.dtb
 dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)	+= sm8450-sony-xperia-nagara-pdx223.dtb
 dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)	+= sm8450-sony-xperia-nagara-pdx224.dtb
 dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_QCOM)	+= sm8550-hdk.dtb
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450-samsung-r0q.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450-samsung-r0q.dts
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..770507da41ac
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450-samsung-r0q.dts
@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+
+/dts-v1/;
+
+#include <dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h>
+
+#include "sm8450.dtsi"
+#include "pm8350.dtsi"
+#include "pm8350c.dtsi"
+
+/ {
+	model = "Samsung Galaxy S22 5G";
+	compatible = "samsung,r0q", "qcom,sm8450";
+	chassis-type = "handset";
+
+	chosen {
+		#address-cells = <2>;
+		#size-cells = <2>;
+		ranges;
+
+		framebuffer: framebuffer@b8000000 {
+			compatible = "simple-framebuffer";
+			reg = <0x0 0xb8000000 0x0 0x2b00000>;
+			width = <1080>;
+			height = <2340>;
+			stride = <(1080 * 4)>;
+			format = "a8r8g8b8";
+		};
+	};
+
+	vph_pwr: vph-pwr-regulator {
+		compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+		regulator-name = "vph_pwr";
+		regulator-min-microvolt = <3700000>;
+		regulator-max-microvolt = <3700000>;
+		regulator-always-on;
+		regulator-boot-on;
+	};
+
+	reserved-memory {
+		/*
+		 * The bootloader will only keep display hardware enabled
+		 * if this memory region is named exactly 'splash_region'
+		 */
+		splash-region@b8000000 {
+			reg = <0x0 0xb8000000 0x0 0x2b00000>;
+			no-map;
+		};
+	};
+};
+
+&apps_rsc {
+	regulators-0 {
+		compatible = "qcom,pm8350-rpmh-regulators";
+		qcom,pmic-id = "b";
+
+		vdd-s1-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
+		vdd-s2-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
+		vdd-s3-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
+		vdd-s4-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
+		vdd-s5-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
+		vdd-s6-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
+		vdd-s7-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
+		vdd-s8-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
+		vdd-s9-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
+		vdd-s10-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
+		vdd-s11-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
+		vdd-s12-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
+
+		vdd-l2-l7-supply = <&vreg_bob>;
+		vdd-l3-l5-supply = <&vreg_bob>;
+
+		vreg_l2b_3p07: ldo2 {
+			regulator-min-microvolt = <3072000>;
+			regulator-max-microvolt = <3072000>;
+			regulator-initial-mode = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>;
+		};
+
+		vreg_l5b_0p88: ldo5 {
+			regulator-min-microvolt = <880000>;
+			regulator-max-microvolt = <888000>;
+			regulator-initial-mode = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>;
+		};
+	};
+
+	regulators-1 {
+		compatible = "qcom,pm8350c-rpmh-regulators";
+		qcom,pmic-id = "c";
+
+		vdd-s1-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
+		vdd-s2-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
+		vdd-s3-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
+		vdd-s4-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
+		vdd-s5-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
+		vdd-s6-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
+		vdd-s7-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
+		vdd-s8-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
+		vdd-s9-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
+		vdd-s10-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
+
+		vdd-l1-l12-supply = <&vreg_bob>;
+		vdd-l2-l8-supply = <&vreg_bob>;
+		vdd-l3-l4-l5-l7-l13-supply = <&vreg_bob>;
+		vdd-l6-l9-l11-supply = <&vreg_bob>;
+
+		vdd-bob-supply = <&vph_pwr>;
+
+		vreg_bob: bob {
+			regulator-min-microvolt = <3008000>;
+			regulator-max-microvolt = <3960000>;
+			regulator-initial-mode = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_AUTO>;
+		};
+
+		vreg_l1c_1p8: ldo1 {
+			regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
+			regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
+			regulator-initial-mode = <RPMH_REGULATOR_MODE_HPM>;
+		};
+	};
+};
+
+&tlmm {
+	gpio-reserved-ranges = <36 4>; /* SPI (not linked to anything) */
+};
+
+&usb_1 {
+	/* Keep USB 2.0 only for now */
+	qcom,select-utmi-as-pipe-clk;
+
+	status = "okay";
+};
+
+&usb_1_dwc3 {
+	dr_mode = "peripheral";
+	maximum-speed = "high-speed";
+	/* Remove USB3 phy */
+	phys = <&usb_1_hsphy>;
+	phy-names = "usb2-phy";
+};
+
+&usb_1_hsphy {
+	vdda-pll-supply = <&vreg_l5b_0p88>;
+	vdda18-supply = <&vreg_l1c_1p8>;
+	vdda33-supply = <&vreg_l2b_3p07>;
+
+	status = "okay";
+};
-- 
2.50.1

Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: add initial support for Samsung Galaxy S22

[Krishna Kurapati]

On 7/29/2025 5:33 PM, Violet wrote:
> Add new device support for the Samsung Galaxy S22 (SM-S901E) phone
> 
> What works:
> - SimpleFB
> - USB
> 
> Signed-off-by: Violet <violet@atl.tools>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile             |   1 +
>   .../boot/dts/qcom/sm8450-samsung-r0q.dts      | 147 ++++++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 148 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450-samsung-r0q.dts
> 

[...]

> +
> +&tlmm {
> +	gpio-reserved-ranges = <36 4>; /* SPI (not linked to anything) */
> +};
> +
> +&usb_1 {
> +	/* Keep USB 2.0 only for now */
> +	qcom,select-utmi-as-pipe-clk;
> +
> +	status = "okay";
> +}; > +
> +&usb_1_dwc3 {
> +	dr_mode = "peripheral";
> +	maximum-speed = "high-speed";
> +	/* Remove USB3 phy */
> +	phys = <&usb_1_hsphy>;
> +	phy-names = "usb2-phy";
> +};
> +

Hi Violet,

  The usb node has been flattened recently. Its not merged yet, but it 
was acked: [1]. Can you rebase your changes on top of this patch [1].

[1]: 
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250715052739.3831549-3-krishna.kurapati@oss.qualcomm.com/

Regards,
Krishna,

> +&usb_1_hsphy {
> +	vdda-pll-supply = <&vreg_l5b_0p88>;
> +	vdda18-supply = <&vreg_l1c_1p8>;
> +	vdda33-supply = <&vreg_l2b_3p07>;
> +
> +	status = "okay";
> +};

Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: document r0q board binding

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 29/07/2025 14:03, Violet wrote:
> Add binding for the Samsung Galaxy S22 (SM-S901E) board, codenamed R0Q,
> which is based on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Violet <violet@atl.tools>
> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

Actually I need to retract my Ack. You have to use real name.

I also don't get why this is v7. Where are v1-v5?

https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=f%3Aviolet%40atl.tools

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: add initial support for Samsung Galaxy S22

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 29/07/2025 14:03, Violet wrote:
> Add new device support for the Samsung Galaxy S22 (SM-S901E) phone
> 
> What works:
> - SimpleFB
> - USB
> 
> Signed-off-by: Violet <violet@atl.tools>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

Unreviewed. I wonder why I did not spot it earlier - you need to use
proper full name.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH v7 0/2] arm64: dts: qcom: add initial support for Samsung Galaxy S22

[Rob Herring (Arm)]

On Tue, 29 Jul 2025 12:03:29 +0000, Violet wrote:
> Changes in v7:
> - Document the reserved GPIO pins, remove pin 50 as it does not
>  need to be reserved
> - Clarify the phone isn't limited to USB 2.0 but rather USB 3.0
>  isn't implemented yet
> - Add a newline before every 'status' node
> 
> Changes in v6:
> - Remove debug features (bootargs, etc) that slipped in the v5 DTS
> - Format and organize nodes correctly based on existing DTS,
>  move "status = "okay";" to the bottom always
> - Solve "ddr_device_type" and "qcom,rmtfs-mem" warnings, the rest are
>  from existing SoC .dtsi
> - Disable buttons, ufs and other features for later revision
> 
> Changes in v5:
> - Properly format the thread
> 
> Changes in v4:
> - Try to properly format the thread
> 
> Changes in v3:
> - Removed unnecessary initrd start and end addresses
> - Make sure r0q is in right order on Makefile
> - Properly format memory addresses
> - Set r0q to the correct, alphabetical order in documents
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Attempt to format the patchset thread correctly
> 
> Signed-off-by: Violet <violet@atl.tools>
> 
> Violet (2):
>   dt-bindings: arm: qcom: document r0q board binding
>   arm64: dts: qcom: add initial support for Samsung Galaxy S22
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml         |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/Makefile             |   1 +
>  .../boot/dts/qcom/sm8450-samsung-r0q.dts      | 147 ++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 149 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450-samsung-r0q.dts
> 
> --
> 2.50.1
> 
> 
> 


My bot found new DTB warnings on the .dts files added or changed in this
series.

Some warnings may be from an existing SoC .dtsi. Or perhaps the warnings
are fixed by another series. Ultimately, it is up to the platform
maintainer whether these warnings are acceptable or not. No need to reply
unless the platform maintainer has comments.

If you already ran DT checks and didn't see these error(s), then
make sure dt-schema is up to date:

  pip3 install dtschema --upgrade


This patch series was applied (using b4) to base:
 Base: attempting to guess base-commit...
 Base: tags/next-20250729 (best guess, 1/2 blobs matched)

If this is not the correct base, please add 'base-commit' tag
(or use b4 which does this automatically)

New warnings running 'make CHECK_DTBS=y for arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/' for 20250729120331.287245-1-violet@atl.tools:

arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450-samsung-r0q.dtb: clock-controller@aaf0000 (qcom,sm8450-videocc): power-domains: [[98, 6]] is too short
	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/qcom,sm8450-videocc.yaml#
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450-samsung-r0q.dtb: clock-controller@aaf0000 (qcom,sm8450-videocc): required-opps: [[55]] is too short
	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/qcom,sm8450-videocc.yaml#
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450-samsung-r0q.dtb: clock-controller@aaf0000 (qcom,sm8450-videocc): Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('power-domains', 'required-opps' were unexpected)
	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/qcom,sm8450-videocc.yaml#
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450-samsung-r0q.dtb: clock-controller@ade0000 (qcom,sm8450-camcc): power-domains: [[98, 6]] is too short
	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/qcom,sm8450-camcc.yaml#
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450-samsung-r0q.dtb: clock-controller@ade0000 (qcom,sm8450-camcc): required-opps: [[55]] is too short
	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/qcom,sm8450-camcc.yaml#