From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D28A53314A4; Mon, 27 Oct 2025 22:34:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761604496; cv=none; b=A6BEyMq+qXGm5EyVjfyGCNhHlCxmptMzMjZxMWMSR7mr8RZVuCjSTqnWCvGHzx6u8uZSAN+HQQ01wKyAPMo3G+HkLSdIoo5qbYhavezmB2xZSPho/IQrwjUItT8xec9Tu/Mj+i7ScDGO+ywJERpjKw4+1R8+QT11X3l4jSxkKwo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761604496; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jssYa7+IMwvZemycj+BIVEijBHykpF6ceVXygIXGnh8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Jc2gfsxIPX3TaL31bRrBuyrZ9qjCvD1DBykfN72es0uWZ6vHC+xTJIHo7yttw3B7+h9vwdisxfAfrBv7mcagAq+cZM3adaU0SkCh/KPIDvgng3r7MiKHbGxxdeVV0zEXTB5EcwgDDxpmkXjF5sisW8CwxOhHtXK/TyzYEl183U8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=jPaaY/jW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="jPaaY/jW" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 28D26C4CEF1; Mon, 27 Oct 2025 22:34:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1761604496; bh=jssYa7+IMwvZemycj+BIVEijBHykpF6ceVXygIXGnh8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jPaaY/jWNrxe3TPeeblKLIuUIKibuw+IC2g8OKX8t0TrgCUTjjWBqctbQjRvVIz1j jhkXPbepTjHqyEwafQdGAI81UJ8wZ+79y0XCRlBBIym8g376xbYXZneP1953HCYekq AY9Y5uwqmXvJh6XVBquaECxTj0nD5oJQtBUXmT6MrS4rF8jSuLOYXKlg7Ztouo1FVy N/ORPxaOl4/NRR8q0Rq90HVrSl+qAE/xDMkKiA3t80/Mulv+qpoJcnVQVl3+y1uI5J VCZxZ+oyq8Ux3XCY9BJ4RjyKJCNm9sM454YBGyiTssPkfYfxL2wIBYC40cQ+vFK8bb 0h/2E5AIrtvqQ== From: Bjorn Andersson To: Konrad Dybcio , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Dmitry Baryshkov Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] arm64: dts: qcom: rename dtsi files for sm6150, x1e80100 and qcs8300 Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 17:36:50 -0500 Message-ID: <176160465180.73268.9117580201716444313.b4-ty@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.51.0 In-Reply-To: <20250923-rename-dts-v1-0-21888b68c781@oss.qualcomm.com> References: <20250923-rename-dts-v1-0-21888b68c781@oss.qualcomm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 14:01:53 +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > Bjorn said to me that he disliked the conseqeuences of renaming > qcs615.dtsi to sm6150.dtsi. Let's increase entropy even more and rename > even more base DTSI files. > > Leaving jokes aside. It's not uncommon to see different names for the > same SoC (or almost same SoC, with no visible differences from the Linux > side). The platform now known as 'lemans' is a good example, because it > had been using SA8775P, QCS9100 and QCS9075 in different contexts for > slightly different modifications. QCS8300 / QCS8275 is another example. > All such names cause a lot of confusion when somebody tries to follow > the actual SoC used by the platform. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/3] arm64: dts: qcom: rename qcs8300 to monaco commit: e50e601ef5b96def44c9ca9685cda6832eb7578e [2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: rename x1e80100 to hamoa commit: 8c0b058ab5983a4be6690a76be9b0294853e8e55 [3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: rename sm6150 to talos commit: 9a5b294dcc21f0b20b586206e5bab9969b4add1c Best regards, -- Bjorn Andersson