Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] dt-bindings: display/msm: Add SM6150 DisplayPort controller

[Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>]

On 23/10/2025 07:50, Xiangxu Yin wrote:
> 
> On 10/22/2025 11:07 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 11:18:07AM +0800, Xiangxu Yin via B4 Relay wrote:
>>> From: Xiangxu Yin <xiangxu.yin@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>>
>>> SM6150 uses the same DisplayPort controller as SM8150, which is already
>>> compatible with SM8350. Add the SM6150-specific compatible string and
>>> update the binding example accordingly.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Xiangxu Yin <xiangxu.yin@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>> ---
>>>   .../devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm6150-mdss.yaml   | 13 ++++++++++++-
>>>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm6150-mdss.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm6150-mdss.yaml
>>> index 9ac24f99d3ada1c197c9654dc9babebccae972ed..89852af70de97a9025079107b838de578778c049 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm6150-mdss.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm6150-mdss.yaml
>>> @@ -51,6 +51,16 @@ patternProperties:
>>>         compatible:
>>>           const: qcom,sm6150-dpu
>>>   
>>> +  "^displayport-controller@[0-9a-f]+$":
>>> +    type: object
>>> +    additionalProperties: true
>>> +    properties:
>>> +      compatible:
>>> +        items:
>>> +          - const: qcom,sm6150-dp
>>> +          - const: qcom,sm8150-dp
>>> +          - const: qcom,sm8350-dp
>>> +
>>>     "^dsi@[0-9a-f]+$":
>>>       type: object
>>>       additionalProperties: true
>>> @@ -132,13 +142,14 @@ examples:
>>>                   port@0 {
>>>                     reg = <0>;
>>>                     dpu_intf0_out: endpoint {
>>> +                    remote-endpoint = <&mdss_dp0_in>;
>> Why?
> 
> 
> Oh, I think I misunderstood the “messed up indentation” comment from Krzysztof.
> It seems the two-space indentation under port@X and opp-x is the actual issue.
> 
> However, that part was not introduced in this patch.
> I will split a separate patch to fix the indentation there.

Note, you have two different chunks here. The first one is useless as it 
adds a graph arc to a node that is not a part of the example.

> 
> 
>>>                     };
>>>                   };
>>>   
>>>                   port@1 {
>>>                     reg = <1>;
>>>                     dpu_intf1_out: endpoint {
>>> -                      remote-endpoint = <&mdss_dsi0_in>;
>>> +                    remote-endpoint = <&mdss_dsi0_in>;
>> Why?
> 
> 
> Ack.

Use YAML coding style (two-space indentation). For DTS examples in the 
schema, preferred is four-space indentation.


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry