From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26499155A5D; Fri, 27 Feb 2026 21:49:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772228949; cv=none; b=TlghXmbs0g3JOcvMn8kPGMAMggTtIB+xAQ97DZZg+oa2BGdrWOSpSlkaZtTVEmTYJrKARt+8AxLTXcGpt8u+pDgyjlIb5K57DvtK688bRVb9qLtm55ZLtgyvPlaMtZHJV/veOkenV7XCAXnmvlw+0qZIgJfoyEvDaSDDz6Vp5b0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772228949; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QfBBgQJBS8F95UKPbfTjtdgwQT1EATTGVxmUd+d+Riw=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=RqGJhR+jjfAPgly/ZlxgcC50QQHasevNRCuECVEd2CPxtVfNNifvx04tHoeZH26OqC1+Vd6UPGOd6vtVRWuP+6jd7Mb+fbA2kIt/M+isFM7Qn1sJpsjyWjW/XWg7Su0b0WehfXYzh3sqqPHbYOI9a/2CYBMKQSH4ov3lGQ7SqPw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=OhfwMwnF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="OhfwMwnF" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2290EC116C6; Fri, 27 Feb 2026 21:49:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1772228949; bh=QfBBgQJBS8F95UKPbfTjtdgwQT1EATTGVxmUd+d+Riw=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=OhfwMwnFm4k4QtZFUyS6cAeYof4aOTtqem7wVsjHE7om/Oe669FT2bSvaCyWXRa6c qT5ZzPeTEE8CwKfCKw6GHfDKUq5REZo8oz1aVPDydEyvp7K+dnFcRMsU7sXomWP4tw gLiWNBJkHE7ACuvpCqNCnEIDRepU5FQLMQlX3ECQH7dWVof5G+dyVi0G1GlKSh0oXe up57U10udV5RTkNuJqO/bS3C+j0aYFYV4ZnbkQF+l6KCgairZeQVrY3oAMHy2CaeIZ jVaJftzfz8r2lD9WxLZq+Ryo6XV1v8jx5YlX8QeyF1RJR+HKAG6ktoy932DEl0fjEH d7UWWTohbi9IQ== Message-ID: <1d11c60b-cb17-4d79-b5d8-98cfa4a01c92@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2026 21:49:00 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 02/18] dt-bindings: media: qcom,x1e80100-camss: Convert from inline PHY definitions to PHY handles To: Dmitry Baryshkov , Bryan O'Donoghue Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Bjorn Andersson , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Robert Foss , Todor Tomov , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Konrad Dybcio , Vladimir Zapolskiy , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org References: <20260226-fluffy-complex-malamute-7ecec6@quoll> <35b1ba2a-e156-4542-b33a-d4e53f6a62cb@kernel.org> <4ebe2f26-29fa-4104-bc90-3f5aa7009ec3@kernel.org> <72f0ed74-ac86-4571-8a72-d41282349718@kernel.org> <934812b1-a853-471f-beb7-3988eff0856d@kernel.org> <71fcb165-7fda-4714-b56b-40d6537b8ccd@linaro.org> From: Bryan O'Donoghue Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 27/02/2026 20:10, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 08:48:45AM +0000, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: >> On 27/02/2026 07:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> Well, is there a way to support both then ? >>> I would just not touch x1e80100, but if you want then probably binding >>> should stay backwards compatible, where you keep all properties intact >>> and only add csiphy nodes. >>> >> >> I really want to stop adding new stuff with the legacy way that has broken >> power-rails, even if that means x1e has a bit Frankenstein binding. > > X1 is fine. Please thing of a migration path for the older platforms > too. Yeah no we're very much singing from the same hymn sheet here. As I told you elsewhere but its worth stating for the internet machine, I thought "put the CSIPHY at the same scope as the CCI" and am not wedded to the choice between sub-nodes of CAMSS or peer nodes to CAMSS aside from the above statement. Being able to move older platforms with already fixed schema to the new CSIPHY driver hadn't really occured to me but, since you raise it, I think its worth trying to support. I will alloc(cycles); --- bod