Re: [GIT PULL] generic arm for MSM

[Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>]

On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 03:49:24PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 18:46 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > 
> > > These are all mostly small patches that I've sent out a few times with
> > > no comments. Let me know if you see any issues.
> > > 
> > > The following changes since commit 7ee744f22ffad619e23912a22d1b2795e10ed825:
> > >   Stephen Rothwell (1):
> > >         Add linux-next specific files for 20100324
> > 
> > Never base your tree on linux-next.  You really should use a stable 
> > tree, such as Linus' tree.  The linux-next tree is constantly thrown 
> > away and rebuilt, and your own tree will keep a reference on that 
> > obsoleted linux-next version otherwise.
> 
> I only based this pull request on next , since I can't get Russell tree
> anyplace else. I've had patches in the past which I've had to use next
> cause there are underlying changes that I can only find in next .. So no
> I don't base development trees on next generally.

http://www.home.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/

has a link to gitweb for it, and a url pointing to where it is on the
ftp/http site:

# rmk's GIT tree
# rmk's random kernel patches and git tree 

It's not like it's hidden.