From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] arm: kconfig: push down CACHE_L2X0
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:50:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100412185024.GH3048@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1270236996.26326.7.camel@c-dwalke-linux.qualcomm.com>
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 12:36:36PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> Does it make sense to push down this value? It looks like it's just
> adding more and more sub-architectures .. Is the method below
> acceptable?
Yes, but please name it HAVE_CACHE_L2X0.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-12 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-02 19:36 [RFC PATCH] arm: kconfig: push down CACHE_L2X0 Daniel Walker
2010-04-12 18:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100412185024.GH3048@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=dwalker@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).