From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:23480 "EHLO wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751040Ab0E1R4P (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 May 2010 13:56:15 -0400 Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 10:56:13 -0700 From: David Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/25] msm: generalize clock support. Message-ID: <20100528175613.GA5455@huya.qualcomm.com> References: <> <1273700754-10256-6-git-send-email-dwalker@codeaurora.org> <20100524185540.GA1292@ucw.cz> <20100525005115.GA7791@huya.qualcomm.com> <20100526173753.GD9069@elf.ucw.cz> <20100526185833.GA5548@huya.qualcomm.com> <20100527153413.GC1957@elf.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100527153413.GC1957@elf.ucw.cz> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Pavel Machek Cc: David Brown , Daniel Walker , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , Abhijeet Dharmapurikar , Gregory Bean , Stepan Moskovchenko , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 05:34:14PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Are you sure? I believe that Dual GPL/BSD is ok, just BSD is not. > > > > It is, according to the FSF > > > > Not acording to kernel sources. Please make it dual GPL/BSD. If this is actually necessary, we can go back and wrangle another license change, but it is a fairly painful and unpleasant process. We changed to this license initially because of an objection to a dual license (admittedly a poorly worded one). The BSD license is compatible with the GPL, and it should not be necessary to add any kind of dual license to it. David