From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Gregory Bean <gbean@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@analog.com>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>,
David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org>,
Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] gpio: msm7200a: Add gpiolib support for MSM chips.
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:01:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100615130131.bf20833a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1276301969-31385-2-git-send-email-gbean@codeaurora.org>
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 17:19:28 -0700
Gregory Bean <gbean@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> Add support for uniprocessor MSM chips whose TLMM/GPIO design
> is the same as the MSM7200A.
> This includes, but is not necessarily limited to, the:
> MSM7200A, MSM7x25, MSM7x27, MSM7x30, QSD8x50, QSD8x50A
>
>
> ...
>
> +static inline unsigned bit(unsigned offset)
> +{
> + BUG_ON(offset >= sizeof(unsigned) * 8);
> + return 1U << offset;
> +}
Could use bitops.h's BIT(), but it hardly matters.
> +/*
> + * This function assumes that msm_gpio_dev::lock is held.
> + */
> +static inline void set_gpio_bit(unsigned n, void __iomem *reg)
> +{
> + writel(readl(reg) | bit(n), reg);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * This function assumes that msm_gpio_dev::lock is held.
> + */
> +static inline void clr_gpio_bit(unsigned n, void __iomem *reg)
> +{
> + writel(readl(reg) & ~bit(n), reg);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * This function assumes that msm_gpio_dev::lock is held.
> + */
> +static inline void
> +msm_gpio_write(struct msm_gpio_dev *dev, unsigned n, unsigned on)
> +{
> + if (on)
> + set_gpio_bit(n, dev->regs.out);
> + else
> + clr_gpio_bit(n, dev->regs.out);
> +}
Recent gcc's often uninline things whcih were marked inline. Doesn't
matter much.
>
> ...
>
> +static int gpio_chip_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
> +{
> + struct msm_gpio_dev *msm_gpio = TO_MSM_GPIO_DEV(chip);
> + unsigned long irq_flags;
> + int ret;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&msm_gpio->lock, irq_flags);
> + ret = readl(msm_gpio->regs.in) & bit(offset) ? 1 : 0;
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&msm_gpio->lock, irq_flags);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
The locking here is actually unneeded, I expect.
> +static void gpio_chip_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset, int value)
> +{
> + struct msm_gpio_dev *msm_gpio = TO_MSM_GPIO_DEV(chip);
> + unsigned long irq_flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&msm_gpio->lock, irq_flags);
> + msm_gpio_write(msm_gpio, offset, value);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&msm_gpio->lock, irq_flags);
> +}
> +
> +static int msm_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
> +{
> + struct msm_gpio_dev *msm_gpio;
> + struct msm7200a_gpio_platform_data *pdata =
> + (struct msm7200a_gpio_platform_data *)dev->dev.platform_data;
The the typecast of a void* is unneeded and undesirable because it
defeats typechecking.
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!pdata)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + msm_gpio = kzalloc(sizeof(struct msm_gpio_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!msm_gpio)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + spin_lock_init(&msm_gpio->lock);
> + platform_set_drvdata(dev, msm_gpio);
> + memcpy(&msm_gpio->regs,
> + &pdata->regs,
> + sizeof(struct msm7200a_gpio_regs));
> +
> + msm_gpio->gpio_chip.label = dev->name;
> + msm_gpio->gpio_chip.base = pdata->gpio_base;
> + msm_gpio->gpio_chip.ngpio = pdata->ngpio;
> + msm_gpio->gpio_chip.direction_input = gpio_chip_direction_input;
> + msm_gpio->gpio_chip.direction_output = gpio_chip_direction_output;
> + msm_gpio->gpio_chip.get = gpio_chip_get;
> + msm_gpio->gpio_chip.set = gpio_chip_set;
> +
> + ret = gpiochip_add(&msm_gpio->gpio_chip);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto err_post_malloc;
> +
> + return ret;
> +err_post_malloc:
> + kfree(msm_gpio);
Maybe undo platform_set_drvdata() here?
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
>
> ...
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-15 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-12 0:19 [PATCH 0/2 v2] gpio: msm7200a: Add gpiolib support for MSM chips Gregory Bean
2010-06-12 0:19 ` [PATCH 1/2 " Gregory Bean
2010-06-15 20:01 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2010-06-12 0:19 ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] gpio: msm7200a: Add irq support to msm-gpiolib Gregory Bean
2010-06-15 20:12 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100615130131.bf20833a.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=bryanh@codeaurora.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=davidb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dwalker@codeaurora.org \
--cc=gbean@codeaurora.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).