From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:34335 "EHLO
	caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1755061Ab0JVHtr (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 22 Oct 2010 03:49:47 -0400
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 08:49:18 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] arm: msm: moved Kconfig machine entry into mach-msm
Message-ID: <20101022074918.GA25606@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <1287686255-18674-1-git-send-email-dwalker@codeaurora.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1287686255-18674-1-git-send-email-dwalker@codeaurora.org>
Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-arm-msm.vger.kernel.org>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 11:37:35AM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> Has anyone suggested this? It seems like it might reduce conflicts
> in the Kconfig file.

How?  The choice normally has one entry for each mach- directory.
You're still going to have 'source' for each mach- directory, so
the chances of conflicts are no different.

Plus it increases the file count, makes things more indirect, and
therefore harder to follow.