From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ch-zrh-72-201.trenka.ch ([93.188.72.201]:34647 "EHLO mail.o2s.ch" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752566Ab0JaTZp (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Oct 2010 15:25:45 -0400 From: David =?iso-8859-1?q?Lanzend=F6rfer?= Subject: DBUS into kernel? Any future? Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:27:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2148963.xGlz4vHWhn"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201010312027.07820.david.lanzendoerfer@o2s.ch> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org --nextPart2148963.xGlz4vHWhn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Certainly you've all heard about the trial to bring dbus into the kernel space. What do you personally think of this? Any chance that it could get an official part of the linux kernel? Or will there be an alternate branche called linux-kdbus which will be just regulary merged with upstream at least? Because it would be a great win for performance on embedded devices, in my opinion... best regards leviathan --nextPart2148963.xGlz4vHWhn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkzNwwsACgkQAeZw77btGjqgxgCgpRMvWGOg7Gn1qRibEPlwgnVN fV4AoKWEQEWdBQ3ePrJu2zw2iy3tKEmN =N6jP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2148963.xGlz4vHWhn--