linux-arm-msm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: merez@codeaurora.org
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH v2] usb: Add streams support to epautoconf.
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:58:27 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101221175827.GA8709@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ccc3842ee0be7b1036143d1fccd005a0.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org>

On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 05:46:34AM -0800, merez@codeaurora.org wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:58AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > Ok, but please note the word of "proprietary" usually means something 
> else when talking about kernel code (i.e. licensing issues.)
> >
> > I'll be glad to take this type of patch when you also provide a patch
> that uses the callback, but not before then.
> 
> What I meant by "proprietary" is not proprietary in the terms of kernel
> world. I meant a unique algorithm, different from the default. Sorry for
> the misunderstanding.
> Currently we don't have a unique algorithm. When implementing this change
> we thought it may be useful for other controllers but for us the default
> implementation was good enough.

First rule of kernel development, "don't add infrastructure that you do
not need today."

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2010-12-21 17:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-12-21 13:46 [RFC/PATCH v2] usb: Add streams support to epautoconf merez
2010-12-21 17:58 ` Greg KH [this message]
2010-12-22 11:58   ` merez
2010-12-28  7:23     ` merez
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-12-20 19:33 merez
2010-12-20 19:58 ` Greg KH
2010-12-16  7:34 Maya Erez
2010-12-16 18:15 ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101221175827.GA8709@suse.de \
    --to=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=merez@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).