From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: i2c runtime suspend and system wide suspend Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 11:35:03 +0000 Message-ID: <20101230113502.GA8537@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <4D1C0CFE.5010008@codeaurora.org> <201012301149.30888.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:41601 "EHLO opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751326Ab0L3LfF (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Dec 2010 06:35:05 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201012301149.30888.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Rabin Vincent , Abhijeet Dharmapurikar , Jean Delvare , Rajendra Nayak , Kevin Hilman , Vishwanath BS , Partha Basak , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 11:49:30AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, December 30, 2010, Rabin Vincent wrote: > > https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2010-December/029658.html > I'm not sure what happened to the last patch. Is there a new version? > If so, is it going to be pushed through the i2c tree, or should I take it? Jean appears to be on holiday for the Christmas vacation. I do have a new version which I'll post later today. Since it depends on the patch protoyping the generic API calls which the SPI patch also depends on it'd probably be best to merge via your tree.