From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [RFC 2/5] ARM: P2V: avoid initializers and assembly using PHYS_OFFSET Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 09:08:55 +0000 Message-ID: <20110106090855.GR8638@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20110104202052.GE24935@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20110106085145.GB26617@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:59439 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751354Ab1AFJJg (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jan 2011 04:09:36 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110106085145.GB26617@pengutronix.de> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Sascha Hauer Cc: Nicolas Pitre , Daniel Walker , Eric Miao , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, "Hans J. Koch" , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Bryan Huntsman , Amit Kucheria , Sascha Hauer , Kukjin Kim , David Brown , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 09:51:45AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > As Russell noted this conflicts with the current i.MX branch. In current > i.MX branch we have: > > - .boot_params = PHYS_OFFSET + 0x100, > + .boot_params = MX51_PHYS_OFFSET + 0x100, > > PLAT_PHYS_OFFSET should be defined to MX51_PHYS_OFFSET, so it shouldn't > matter which solution to the conflict we choose. I've actually dropped my modifications to this files as your change to them makes more sense longer term.