From: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>
To: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@no-log.org>
Cc: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@fifo99.com>,
Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@codeaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: msm: Remove MSM7x00 support
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 07:26:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111202152609.GA6986@huya.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201112021417.17082.GNUtoo@no-log.org>
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 02:17:17PM +0100, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote:
> >And I've learned what I needed to now: someone does still care about
> >the target.
> However in a response to the following mail:
> [Question] RPC and SMD implementation
> David Brown already told that:
> >Is there much reason to get the msm72xx support into the kernel in the
> >first place? These targets are old, and I don't believe any new
> >devices are being made using them
> And:
> >Things are a lot easier in the newer RPC/SMD versions,
> >and I don't see a strong reason to keep the kruft in the kernel
> >necessary to support the 72xx chips.
> I guess that means that RPC for msm7x00 won't hit mainline.
> So without RPC the port to mainline cannot be complete(no modem, no audio, no
> GPS,and maybe more depending on the device).
There isn't anything stopping someone from working on the port. The
Android kernels for the target are still available. But, I think most
people working on the MSM code will be focusing on newer devices,
especially now that there is an 8660 dev board available.
David
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-02 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-01 0:29 [PATCH 1/3] ARM: msm: Remove MSM7x00 support David Brown
2011-12-01 0:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] gpio_msm: remove support for MSM7x01 David Brown
2011-12-01 0:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: msm: Remove cpu_is test for msm7201 soc David Brown
2011-12-01 15:17 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: msm: Remove MSM7x00 support Daniel Walker
2011-12-01 18:17 ` David Brown
2011-12-01 18:39 ` Daniel Walker
2011-12-01 19:27 ` David Brown
2011-12-01 19:33 ` Daniel Walker
2011-12-01 19:43 ` David Brown
2011-12-01 19:53 ` Daniel Walker
2011-12-01 20:17 ` David Brown
2011-12-01 20:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-12-01 20:25 ` Daniel Walker
2011-12-01 20:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-12-01 20:49 ` Daniel Walker
2011-12-01 21:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-12-01 21:34 ` Daniel Walker
2011-12-01 20:26 ` David Brown
2011-12-01 20:32 ` Daniel Walker
2011-12-02 13:17 ` Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
2011-12-02 15:26 ` David Brown [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111202152609.GA6986@huya.qualcomm.com \
--to=davidb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=GNUtoo@no-log.org \
--cc=bryanh@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dwalker@fifo99.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).