[PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls

[PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls

[Maxime Ripard]

Hi everyone,

This is a splitted up version of the patch I previously sent to
remove the explicit declaration of irqchip_init as the init_irq callback in
the machine descriptions.

Since it was a pretty tricky patch to merge, since it was touching a lot of
different platforms, I splitted it for each platforms, and rebased it on top
of 3.10-rc1.

The best way to merge it is probably that each one of us take into their tree
the patches that are relevant for our architecture and send them to arm-soc
later on.

Thanks,
Maxime

Changes from v1:
  - Removed the dead include of linux/irqchip.h
  - Splitted the shmobile changes into several patches

Maxime Ripard (20):
  ARM: sunxi: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
  ARM: zynq: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
  ARM: nomadik: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
  ARM: picoxcell: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
  ARM: shmobile: ape6evm: Remove init_irq declaration in machine
    description
  ARM: shmobile: kzm9g: Remove init_irq declaration in machine
    description
  ARM: shmobile: lager: Remove init_irq declaration in machine
    description
  ARM: shmobile: emev2: Remove init_irq declaration in machine
    description
  ARM: shmobile: r8a73a4: Remove init_irq declaration in machine
    description
  ARM: shmobile: r8a7790: Remove init_irq declaration in machine
    description
  ARM: shmobile: sh73a0: Remove init_irq declaration in machine
    description
  ARM: bcm281xx: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
  ARM: spear: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
  ARM: msm: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
  ARM: mvebu: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
  ARM: mxs: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
  ARM: sirf: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
  ARM: vexpress: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
  ARM: virt: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
  ARM: vt8500: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

 arch/arm/mach-bcm/board_bcm.c                  | 2 --
 arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8660.c              | 2 --
 arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8960.c              | 2 --
 arch/arm/mach-mvebu/armada-370-xp.c            | 2 --
 arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mxs.c                   | 2 --
 arch/arm/mach-nomadik/cpu-8815.c               | 2 --
 arch/arm/mach-picoxcell/common.c               | 2 --
 arch/arm/mach-prima2/common.c                  | 4 ----
 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c         | 2 --
 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g-reference.c | 2 --
 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager.c           | 2 --
 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c           | 2 --
 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a73a4.c         | 2 --
 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7790.c         | 2 --
 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh73a0.c          | 2 --
 arch/arm/mach-spear/spear1310.c                | 2 --
 arch/arm/mach-spear/spear1340.c                | 2 --
 arch/arm/mach-spear/spear300.c                 | 2 --
 arch/arm/mach-spear/spear310.c                 | 2 --
 arch/arm/mach-spear/spear320.c                 | 2 --
 arch/arm/mach-spear/spear6xx.c                 | 2 --
 arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c                    | 2 --
 arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c                   | 2 --
 arch/arm/mach-virt/virt.c                      | 2 --
 arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c                  | 2 --
 arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c                    | 2 --
 26 files changed, 54 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.1.2

[PATCH 01/20] ARM: sunxi: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Maxime Ripard]

Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for sunxi as well.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c
index 706ce35..08937a3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
 #include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
 #include <linux/of_address.h>
 #include <linux/of_irq.h>
 #include <linux/of_platform.h>
@@ -117,7 +116,6 @@ static const char * const sunxi_board_dt_compat[] = {
 DT_MACHINE_START(SUNXI_DT, "Allwinner A1X (Device Tree)")
 	.init_machine	= sunxi_dt_init,
 	.map_io		= sunxi_map_io,
-	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
 	.init_time	= sunxi_timer_init,
 	.dt_compat	= sunxi_board_dt_compat,
 MACHINE_END
-- 
1.8.1.2

[PATCH 02/20] ARM: zynq: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Maxime Ripard]

Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for zynq as well.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
---
 arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c
index 5bfe703..4c0199b8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c
@@ -25,7 +25,6 @@
 #include <linux/of_irq.h>
 #include <linux/of_platform.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
 
 #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
 #include <asm/mach/map.h>
@@ -106,7 +105,6 @@ static const char * const zynq_dt_match[] = {
 MACHINE_START(XILINX_EP107, "Xilinx Zynq Platform")
 	.smp		= smp_ops(zynq_smp_ops),
 	.map_io		= zynq_map_io,
-	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
 	.init_machine	= zynq_init_machine,
 	.init_time	= zynq_timer_init,
 	.dt_compat	= zynq_dt_match,
-- 
1.8.1.2

Re: [PATCH 02/20] ARM: zynq: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Michal Simek]

On 05/14/2013 05:38 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> declaration for zynq as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> Acked-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c
> index 5bfe703..4c0199b8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c
> @@ -25,7 +25,6 @@
>  #include <linux/of_irq.h>
>  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
> -#include <linux/irqchip.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
>  #include <asm/mach/map.h>
> @@ -106,7 +105,6 @@ static const char * const zynq_dt_match[] = {
>  MACHINE_START(XILINX_EP107, "Xilinx Zynq Platform")
>  	.smp		= smp_ops(zynq_smp_ops),
>  	.map_io		= zynq_map_io,
> -	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
>  	.init_machine	= zynq_init_machine,
>  	.init_time	= zynq_timer_init,
>  	.dt_compat	= zynq_dt_match,
> 

Subject should contain v2 but anyway I have added it my zynq repo.

Thanks,
Michal

[PATCH 03/20] ARM: nomadik: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Maxime Ripard]

Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for nomadik as well.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm/mach-nomadik/cpu-8815.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-nomadik/cpu-8815.c b/arch/arm/mach-nomadik/cpu-8815.c
index 59f6ff5..46cce9b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-nomadik/cpu-8815.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-nomadik/cpu-8815.c
@@ -25,7 +25,6 @@
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/irq.h>
 #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
 #include <linux/platform_data/clk-nomadik.h>
 #include <linux/platform_data/pinctrl-nomadik.h>
 #include <linux/pinctrl/machine.h>
@@ -323,7 +322,6 @@ static const char * cpu8815_board_compat[] = {
 
 DT_MACHINE_START(NOMADIK_DT, "Nomadik STn8815")
 	.map_io		= cpu8815_map_io,
-	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
 	.init_time	= cpu8815_timer_init_of,
 	.init_machine	= cpu8815_init_of,
 	.restart	= cpu8815_restart,
-- 
1.8.1.2

[PATCH 04/20] ARM: picoxcell: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Maxime Ripard]

Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for picoxcell as well.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-picoxcell/common.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-picoxcell/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-picoxcell/common.c
index 70b441a..c2721ce 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-picoxcell/common.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-picoxcell/common.c
@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
  */
 #include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/irq.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
 #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/of_address.h>
@@ -87,7 +86,6 @@ static void picoxcell_wdt_restart(char mode, const char *cmd)
 DT_MACHINE_START(PICOXCELL, "Picochip picoXcell")
 	.map_io		= picoxcell_map_io,
 	.nr_irqs	= NR_IRQS_LEGACY,
-	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
 	.init_time	= dw_apb_timer_init,
 	.init_machine	= picoxcell_init_machine,
 	.dt_compat	= picoxcell_dt_match,
-- 
1.8.1.2

Re: [PATCH 04/20] ARM: picoxcell: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Jamie Iles]

Hi Maxime,

Thanks for this, I'll add it to my tree.  I've modified it slightly to 
kill off the other irq includes, hopefully that's okay with you.

Thanks,

Jamie

8<---

>From 4b83f75a7af388aaf5f79ccf72c37074bc9166da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 17:38:37 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: picoxcell: Remove init_irq declaration in machine
 description

Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for picoxcell as well.

[ jiles: removed other, unused irq includes. ]

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-picoxcell/common.c | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-picoxcell/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-picoxcell/common.c
index f6f71bb..b069fa6 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-picoxcell/common.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-picoxcell/common.c
@@ -8,12 +8,8 @@
  * All enquiries to support@picochip.com
  */
 #include <linux/delay.h>
-#include <linux/irq.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
-#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/of_address.h>
-#include <linux/of_irq.h>
 #include <linux/of_platform.h>
 #include <linux/dw_apb_timer.h>
 
@@ -85,7 +81,6 @@ static void picoxcell_wdt_restart(char mode, const char *cmd)
 DT_MACHINE_START(PICOXCELL, "Picochip picoXcell")
 	.map_io		= picoxcell_map_io,
 	.nr_irqs	= NR_IRQS_LEGACY,
-	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
 	.init_time	= dw_apb_timer_init,
 	.init_machine	= picoxcell_init_machine,
 	.dt_compat	= picoxcell_dt_match,
-- 
1.8.1.2

Re: [PATCH 04/20] ARM: picoxcell: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Maxime Ripard]

Hi Jamie,

Le 14/05/2013 18:20, Jamie Iles a écrit :
> Hi Maxime,
> 
> Thanks for this, I'll add it to my tree.  I've modified it slightly to 
> kill off the other irq includes, hopefully that's okay with you.

Yes, I was pretty conservative since I was not familiar with most of the
code, but yes, I'm fine with the changes.

Thank you,
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Re: [PATCH 04/20] ARM: picoxcell: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Jamie Iles]

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:19:56AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Jamie,
> 
> Le 14/05/2013 18:20, Jamie Iles a écrit :
> > Hi Maxime,
> > 
> > Thanks for this, I'll add it to my tree.  I've modified it slightly to 
> > kill off the other irq includes, hopefully that's okay with you.
> 
> Yes, I was pretty conservative since I was not familiar with most of the
> code, but yes, I'm fine with the changes.

Thanks Maxime, applied to picoxcell-next.

Jamie

[PATCH 05/20] ARM: shmobile: ape6evm: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Maxime Ripard]

Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for shmobile as well.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c
index 55b8c9f..8dfbdba 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c
@@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
 
 #include <linux/gpio.h>
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/pinctrl/machine.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
@@ -87,7 +86,6 @@ static const char *ape6evm_boards_compat_dt[] __initdata = {
 };
 
 DT_MACHINE_START(APE6EVM_DT, "ape6evm")
-	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
 	.init_time	= shmobile_timer_init,
 	.init_machine	= ape6evm_add_standard_devices,
 	.dt_compat	= ape6evm_boards_compat_dt,
-- 
1.8.1.2

Re: [PATCH 05/20] ARM: shmobile: ape6evm: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Simon Horman]

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:38:38PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> declaration for shmobile as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c
> index 55b8c9f..8dfbdba 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/gpio.h>
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> -#include <linux/irqchip.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/pinctrl/machine.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> @@ -87,7 +86,6 @@ static const char *ape6evm_boards_compat_dt[] __initdata = {
>  };
>  
>  DT_MACHINE_START(APE6EVM_DT, "ape6evm")
> -	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
>  	.init_time	= shmobile_timer_init,
>  	.init_machine	= ape6evm_add_standard_devices,
>  	.dt_compat	= ape6evm_boards_compat_dt,

Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>

Re: [PATCH 05/20] ARM: shmobile: ape6evm: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Simon Horman]

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 09:59:07AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:38:38PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> > specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> > the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> > declaration for shmobile as well.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c | 2 --
> >  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c
> > index 55b8c9f..8dfbdba 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c
> > @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
> >  
> >  #include <linux/gpio.h>
> >  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > -#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> >  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> >  #include <linux/pinctrl/machine.h>
> >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > @@ -87,7 +86,6 @@ static const char *ape6evm_boards_compat_dt[] __initdata = {
> >  };
> >  
> >  DT_MACHINE_START(APE6EVM_DT, "ape6evm")
> > -	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
> >  	.init_time	= shmobile_timer_init,
> >  	.init_machine	= ape6evm_add_standard_devices,
> >  	.dt_compat	= ape6evm_boards_compat_dt,
> 
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>

Sorry, what I should have said is:

Queued up for v3.11 in the boards-spe6evm branch of my renesas tree
on kernel.org. It is included in the renesas-next-20130515 tag of
that tree and should appear in linux-next in the not to distant future.

Re: [PATCH 05/20] ARM: shmobile: ape6evm: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Simon Horman]

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:46:04AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 09:59:07AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:38:38PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> > > specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> > > the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> > > declaration for shmobile as well.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c | 2 --
> > >  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c
> > > index 55b8c9f..8dfbdba 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c
> > > @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
> > >  
> > >  #include <linux/gpio.h>
> > >  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > > -#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> > >  #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > >  #include <linux/pinctrl/machine.h>
> > >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > > @@ -87,7 +86,6 @@ static const char *ape6evm_boards_compat_dt[] __initdata = {
> > >  };
> > >  
> > >  DT_MACHINE_START(APE6EVM_DT, "ape6evm")
> > > -	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
> > >  	.init_time	= shmobile_timer_init,
> > >  	.init_machine	= ape6evm_add_standard_devices,
> > >  	.dt_compat	= ape6evm_boards_compat_dt,
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
> 
> Sorry, what I should have said is:
> 
> Queued up for v3.11 in the boards-spe6evm branch of my renesas tree

s/spe6evm/ape6evm/

> on kernel.org. It is included in the renesas-next-20130515 tag of
> that tree and should appear in linux-next in the not to distant future.
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sh" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

[PATCH 06/20] ARM: shmobile: kzm9g: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Maxime Ripard]

Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for shmobile as well.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g-reference.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g-reference.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g-reference.c
index aefa50d..b7ee96e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g-reference.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g-reference.c
@@ -24,7 +24,6 @@
 #include <linux/gpio.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
 #include <linux/irq.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
 #include <linux/input.h>
 #include <linux/of_platform.h>
 #include <linux/pinctrl/machine.h>
@@ -100,7 +99,6 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(KZM9G_DT, "kzm9g-reference")
 	.map_io		= sh73a0_map_io,
 	.init_early	= sh73a0_init_delay,
 	.nr_irqs	= NR_IRQS_LEGACY,
-	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
 	.init_machine	= kzm_init,
 	.init_time	= shmobile_timer_init,
 	.dt_compat	= kzm9g_boards_compat_dt,
-- 
1.8.1.2

Re: [PATCH 06/20] ARM: shmobile: kzm9g: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Simon Horman]

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:38:39PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> declaration for shmobile as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g-reference.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g-reference.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g-reference.c
> index aefa50d..b7ee96e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g-reference.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g-reference.c
> @@ -24,7 +24,6 @@
>  #include <linux/gpio.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>
>  #include <linux/irq.h>
> -#include <linux/irqchip.h>
>  #include <linux/input.h>
>  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
>  #include <linux/pinctrl/machine.h>
> @@ -100,7 +99,6 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(KZM9G_DT, "kzm9g-reference")
>  	.map_io		= sh73a0_map_io,
>  	.init_early	= sh73a0_init_delay,
>  	.nr_irqs	= NR_IRQS_LEGACY,
> -	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
>  	.init_machine	= kzm_init,
>  	.init_time	= shmobile_timer_init,
>  	.dt_compat	= kzm9g_boards_compat_dt,

Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>

Re: [PATCH 06/20] ARM: shmobile: kzm9g: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Simon Horman]

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 09:59:17AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:38:39PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> > specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> > the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> > declaration for shmobile as well.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g-reference.c | 2 --
> >  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g-reference.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g-reference.c
> > index aefa50d..b7ee96e 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g-reference.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g-reference.c
> > @@ -24,7 +24,6 @@
> >  #include <linux/gpio.h>
> >  #include <linux/io.h>
> >  #include <linux/irq.h>
> > -#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> >  #include <linux/input.h>
> >  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> >  #include <linux/pinctrl/machine.h>
> > @@ -100,7 +99,6 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(KZM9G_DT, "kzm9g-reference")
> >  	.map_io		= sh73a0_map_io,
> >  	.init_early	= sh73a0_init_delay,
> >  	.nr_irqs	= NR_IRQS_LEGACY,
> > -	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
> >  	.init_machine	= kzm_init,
> >  	.init_time	= shmobile_timer_init,
> >  	.dt_compat	= kzm9g_boards_compat_dt,
> 
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>

Sorry, what I should have said is:

Queued up for v3.11 in the boards-kzm9g branch of my renesas tree
on kernel.org. It is included in the renesas-next-20130515 tag of
that tree and should appear in linux-next in the not to distant future.

[PATCH 07/20] ARM: shmobile: lager: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Maxime Ripard]

Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for shmobile as well.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager.c
index f587187..b7488b8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager.c
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
  */
 
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <mach/common.h>
@@ -39,7 +38,6 @@ static const char *lager_boards_compat_dt[] __initdata = {
 };
 
 DT_MACHINE_START(LAGER_DT, "lager")
-	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
 	.init_time	= r8a7790_timer_init,
 	.init_machine	= lager_add_standard_devices,
 	.dt_compat	= lager_boards_compat_dt,
-- 
1.8.1.2

Re: [PATCH 07/20] ARM: shmobile: lager: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Simon Horman]

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:38:40PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> declaration for shmobile as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager.c
> index f587187..b7488b8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager.c
> @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
>   */
>  
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> -#include <linux/irqchip.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <mach/common.h>
> @@ -39,7 +38,6 @@ static const char *lager_boards_compat_dt[] __initdata = {
>  };
>  
>  DT_MACHINE_START(LAGER_DT, "lager")
> -	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
>  	.init_time	= r8a7790_timer_init,
>  	.init_machine	= lager_add_standard_devices,
>  	.dt_compat	= lager_boards_compat_dt,

Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>

Re: [PATCH 07/20] ARM: shmobile: lager: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Simon Horman]

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:38:40PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> declaration for shmobile as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager.c
> index f587187..b7488b8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager.c
> @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
>   */
>  
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> -#include <linux/irqchip.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <mach/common.h>
> @@ -39,7 +38,6 @@ static const char *lager_boards_compat_dt[] __initdata = {
>  };
>  
>  DT_MACHINE_START(LAGER_DT, "lager")
> -	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
>  	.init_time	= r8a7790_timer_init,
>  	.init_machine	= lager_add_standard_devices,
>  	.dt_compat	= lager_boards_compat_dt,

Sorry, what I should have said is:

Queued up for v3.11 in the boards-lager branch of my renesas tree
on kernel.org. It is included in the renesas-next-20130515 tag of
that tree and should appear in linux-next in the not to distant future.

[PATCH 08/20] ARM: shmobile: emev2: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Maxime Ripard]

Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for shmobile as well.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c
index 899a86c..66694e0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c
@@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <linux/irq.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/platform_data/gpio-em.h>
 #include <linux/of_platform.h>
@@ -454,7 +453,6 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(EMEV2_DT, "Generic Emma Mobile EV2 (Flattened Device Tree)")
 	.smp		= smp_ops(emev2_smp_ops),
 	.init_early	= emev2_init_delay,
 	.nr_irqs	= NR_IRQS_LEGACY,
-	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
 	.init_machine	= emev2_add_standard_devices_dt,
 	.dt_compat	= emev2_boards_compat_dt,
 MACHINE_END
-- 
1.8.1.2

Re: [PATCH 08/20] ARM: shmobile: emev2: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Simon Horman]

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:38:41PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> declaration for shmobile as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c
> index 899a86c..66694e0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>  #include <linux/irq.h>
> -#include <linux/irqchip.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_data/gpio-em.h>
>  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> @@ -454,7 +453,6 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(EMEV2_DT, "Generic Emma Mobile EV2 (Flattened Device Tree)")
>  	.smp		= smp_ops(emev2_smp_ops),
>  	.init_early	= emev2_init_delay,
>  	.nr_irqs	= NR_IRQS_LEGACY,
> -	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
>  	.init_machine	= emev2_add_standard_devices_dt,
>  	.dt_compat	= emev2_boards_compat_dt,
>  MACHINE_END

Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>

Re: [PATCH 08/20] ARM: shmobile: emev2: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Simon Horman]

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 09:59:38AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:38:41PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> > specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> > the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> > declaration for shmobile as well.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c | 2 --
> >  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c
> > index 899a86c..66694e0 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c
> > @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
> >  #include <linux/init.h>
> >  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> >  #include <linux/irq.h>
> > -#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >  #include <linux/platform_data/gpio-em.h>
> >  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> > @@ -454,7 +453,6 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(EMEV2_DT, "Generic Emma Mobile EV2 (Flattened Device Tree)")
> >  	.smp		= smp_ops(emev2_smp_ops),
> >  	.init_early	= emev2_init_delay,
> >  	.nr_irqs	= NR_IRQS_LEGACY,
> > -	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
> >  	.init_machine	= emev2_add_standard_devices_dt,
> >  	.dt_compat	= emev2_boards_compat_dt,
> >  MACHINE_END
> 
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>

Sorry, what I should have said is:

Queued up for v3.11 in the soc-emev2 branch of my renesas tree
on kernel.org. It is included in the renesas-next-20130515 tag of
that tree and should appear in linux-next in the not to distant future.

[PATCH 09/20] ARM: shmobile: r8a73a4: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Maxime Ripard]

Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for shmobile as well.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a73a4.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a73a4.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a73a4.c
index c5a75a7..0b78896 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a73a4.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a73a4.c
@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@
  * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA  02110-1301  USA
  */
 #include <linux/irq.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/of_platform.h>
 #include <linux/platform_data/irq-renesas-irqc.h>
@@ -194,7 +193,6 @@ static const char *r8a73a4_boards_compat_dt[] __initdata = {
 };
 
 DT_MACHINE_START(R8A73A4_DT, "Generic R8A73A4 (Flattened Device Tree)")
-	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
 	.init_machine	= r8a73a4_add_standard_devices_dt,
 	.init_time	= shmobile_timer_init,
 	.dt_compat	= r8a73a4_boards_compat_dt,
-- 
1.8.1.2

Re: [PATCH 09/20] ARM: shmobile: r8a73a4: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Simon Horman]

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:38:42PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> declaration for shmobile as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a73a4.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a73a4.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a73a4.c
> index c5a75a7..0b78896 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a73a4.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a73a4.c
> @@ -18,7 +18,6 @@
>   * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA  02110-1301  USA
>   */
>  #include <linux/irq.h>
> -#include <linux/irqchip.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_data/irq-renesas-irqc.h>
> @@ -194,7 +193,6 @@ static const char *r8a73a4_boards_compat_dt[] __initdata = {
>  };
>  
>  DT_MACHINE_START(R8A73A4_DT, "Generic R8A73A4 (Flattened Device Tree)")
> -	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
>  	.init_machine	= r8a73a4_add_standard_devices_dt,
>  	.init_time	= shmobile_timer_init,
>  	.dt_compat	= r8a73a4_boards_compat_dt,

Queued up for v3.11 in the boards-r8a73a4 branch of my renesas tree
on kernel.org. It is included in the renesas-next-20130515 tag of
that tree and should appear in linux-next in the not to distant future.

[PATCH 10/20] ARM: shmobile: r8a7790: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Maxime Ripard]

Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for shmobile as well.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7790.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7790.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7790.c
index 49de2d5..2a7a276 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7790.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7790.c
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
  */
 
 #include <linux/irq.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/of_platform.h>
 #include <linux/serial_sci.h>
@@ -142,7 +141,6 @@ static const char *r8a7790_boards_compat_dt[] __initdata = {
 };
 
 DT_MACHINE_START(R8A7790_DT, "Generic R8A7790 (Flattened Device Tree)")
-	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
 	.init_machine	= r8a7790_add_standard_devices_dt,
 	.init_time	= r8a7790_timer_init,
 	.dt_compat	= r8a7790_boards_compat_dt,
-- 
1.8.1.2

Re: [PATCH 10/20] ARM: shmobile: r8a7790: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Simon Horman]

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:38:43PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> declaration for shmobile as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7790.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7790.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7790.c
> index 49de2d5..2a7a276 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7790.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7790.c
> @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
>   */
>  
>  #include <linux/irq.h>
> -#include <linux/irqchip.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
>  #include <linux/serial_sci.h>
> @@ -142,7 +141,6 @@ static const char *r8a7790_boards_compat_dt[] __initdata = {
>  };
>  
>  DT_MACHINE_START(R8A7790_DT, "Generic R8A7790 (Flattened Device Tree)")
> -	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
>  	.init_machine	= r8a7790_add_standard_devices_dt,
>  	.init_time	= r8a7790_timer_init,
>  	.dt_compat	= r8a7790_boards_compat_dt,

Queued up for v3.11 in the soc-r8a7790 branch of my renesas tree
on kernel.org. It is included in the renesas-next-20130515 tag of
that tree and should appear in linux-next in the not to distant future.

[PATCH 11/20] ARM: shmobile: sh73a0: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Maxime Ripard]

Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for shmobile as well.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh73a0.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh73a0.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh73a0.c
index fdf3894..73dd75b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh73a0.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh73a0.c
@@ -22,7 +22,6 @@
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
 #include <linux/irq.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/of_platform.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
@@ -1035,7 +1034,6 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(SH73A0_DT, "Generic SH73A0 (Flattened Device Tree)")
 	.map_io		= sh73a0_map_io,
 	.init_early	= sh73a0_init_delay,
 	.nr_irqs	= NR_IRQS_LEGACY,
-	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
 	.init_machine	= sh73a0_add_standard_devices_dt,
 	.dt_compat	= sh73a0_boards_compat_dt,
 MACHINE_END
-- 
1.8.1.2

Re: [PATCH 11/20] ARM: shmobile: sh73a0: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Simon Horman]

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:38:44PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> declaration for shmobile as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh73a0.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh73a0.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh73a0.c
> index fdf3894..73dd75b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh73a0.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh73a0.c
> @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>  #include <linux/irq.h>
> -#include <linux/irqchip.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/of_platform.h>
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
> @@ -1035,7 +1034,6 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(SH73A0_DT, "Generic SH73A0 (Flattened Device Tree)")
>  	.map_io		= sh73a0_map_io,
>  	.init_early	= sh73a0_init_delay,
>  	.nr_irqs	= NR_IRQS_LEGACY,
> -	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
>  	.init_machine	= sh73a0_add_standard_devices_dt,
>  	.dt_compat	= sh73a0_boards_compat_dt,
>  MACHINE_END

Queued up for v3.11 in the soc-sh73a0 branch of my renesas tree
on kernel.org. It is included in the renesas-next-20130515 tag of
that tree and should appear in linux-next in the not to distant future.

[PATCH 12/20] ARM: bcm281xx: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Maxime Ripard]

Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for bcm281xx as well.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Christian Daudt <csd@broadcom.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-bcm/board_bcm.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-bcm/board_bcm.c b/arch/arm/mach-bcm/board_bcm.c
index 22e8421..2859932 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-bcm/board_bcm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-bcm/board_bcm.c
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/device.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
 #include <linux/clocksource.h>
 
 #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
@@ -54,7 +53,6 @@ static void __init board_init(void)
 static const char * const bcm11351_dt_compat[] = { "bcm,bcm11351", NULL, };
 
 DT_MACHINE_START(BCM11351_DT, "Broadcom Application Processor")
-	.init_irq = irqchip_init,
 	.init_time = clocksource_of_init,
 	.init_machine = board_init,
 	.dt_compat = bcm11351_dt_compat,
-- 
1.8.1.2

Re: [PATCH 12/20] ARM: bcm281xx: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Christian Daudt]

On 13-05-14 08:38 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> declaration for bcm281xx as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> Acked-by: Christian Daudt <csd@broadcom.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm/mach-bcm/board_bcm.c | 2 --
>   1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-bcm/board_bcm.c b/arch/arm/mach-bcm/board_bcm.c
> index 22e8421..2859932 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-bcm/board_bcm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-bcm/board_bcm.c
> @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
>   #include <linux/init.h>
>   #include <linux/device.h>
>   #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> -#include <linux/irqchip.h>
>   #include <linux/clocksource.h>
>   
>   #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
> @@ -54,7 +53,6 @@ static void __init board_init(void)
>   static const char * const bcm11351_dt_compat[] = { "bcm,bcm11351", NULL, };
>   
>   DT_MACHINE_START(BCM11351_DT, "Broadcom Application Processor")
> -	.init_irq = irqchip_init,
>   	.init_time = clocksource_of_init,
>   	.init_machine = board_init,
>   	.dt_compat = bcm11351_dt_compat,
Applied.

  Thanks,
    csd

[PATCH 13/20] ARM: spear: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Maxime Ripard]

Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for spear as well.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm/mach-spear/spear1310.c | 2 --
 arch/arm/mach-spear/spear1340.c | 2 --
 arch/arm/mach-spear/spear300.c  | 2 --
 arch/arm/mach-spear/spear310.c  | 2 --
 arch/arm/mach-spear/spear320.c  | 2 --
 arch/arm/mach-spear/spear6xx.c  | 2 --
 6 files changed, 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear1310.c b/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear1310.c
index 9eaac2c..7ad0030 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear1310.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear1310.c
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
 #define pr_fmt(fmt) "SPEAr1310: " fmt
 
 #include <linux/amba/pl022.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
 #include <linux/of_platform.h>
 #include <linux/pata_arasan_cf_data.h>
 #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
@@ -60,7 +59,6 @@ static void __init spear1310_map_io(void)
 DT_MACHINE_START(SPEAR1310_DT, "ST SPEAr1310 SoC with Flattened Device Tree")
 	.smp		=	smp_ops(spear13xx_smp_ops),
 	.map_io		=	spear1310_map_io,
-	.init_irq	=	irqchip_init,
 	.init_time	=	spear13xx_timer_init,
 	.init_machine	=	spear1310_dt_init,
 	.restart	=	spear_restart,
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear1340.c b/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear1340.c
index a04a7fe..3fb6834 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear1340.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear1340.c
@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
 #include <linux/amba/serial.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/of_platform.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
 #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
 #include "generic.h"
 #include <mach/spear.h>
@@ -155,7 +154,6 @@ static const char * const spear1340_dt_board_compat[] = {
 DT_MACHINE_START(SPEAR1340_DT, "ST SPEAr1340 SoC with Flattened Device Tree")
 	.smp		=	smp_ops(spear13xx_smp_ops),
 	.map_io		=	spear13xx_map_io,
-	.init_irq	=	irqchip_init,
 	.init_time	=	spear13xx_timer_init,
 	.init_machine	=	spear1340_dt_init,
 	.restart	=	spear_restart,
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear300.c b/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear300.c
index bac56e8..b52e48f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear300.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear300.c
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
 #define pr_fmt(fmt) "SPEAr300: " fmt
 
 #include <linux/amba/pl08x.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
 #include <linux/of_platform.h>
 #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
 #include "generic.h"
@@ -212,7 +211,6 @@ static void __init spear300_map_io(void)
 
 DT_MACHINE_START(SPEAR300_DT, "ST SPEAr300 SoC with Flattened Device Tree")
 	.map_io		=	spear300_map_io,
-	.init_irq	=	irqchip_init,
 	.init_time	=	spear3xx_timer_init,
 	.init_machine	=	spear300_dt_init,
 	.restart	=	spear_restart,
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear310.c b/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear310.c
index 6ffbc63..ed2029d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear310.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear310.c
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
 
 #include <linux/amba/pl08x.h>
 #include <linux/amba/serial.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
 #include <linux/of_platform.h>
 #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
 #include "generic.h"
@@ -254,7 +253,6 @@ static void __init spear310_map_io(void)
 
 DT_MACHINE_START(SPEAR310_DT, "ST SPEAr310 SoC with Flattened Device Tree")
 	.map_io		=	spear310_map_io,
-	.init_irq	=	irqchip_init,
 	.init_time	=	spear3xx_timer_init,
 	.init_machine	=	spear310_dt_init,
 	.restart	=	spear_restart,
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear320.c b/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear320.c
index 6eb3eec..bf634b3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear320.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear320.c
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
 #include <linux/amba/pl022.h>
 #include <linux/amba/pl08x.h>
 #include <linux/amba/serial.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
 #include <linux/of_platform.h>
 #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
 #include <asm/mach/map.h>
@@ -269,7 +268,6 @@ static void __init spear320_map_io(void)
 
 DT_MACHINE_START(SPEAR320_DT, "ST SPEAr320 SoC with Flattened Device Tree")
 	.map_io		=	spear320_map_io,
-	.init_irq	=	irqchip_init,
 	.init_time	=	spear3xx_timer_init,
 	.init_machine	=	spear320_dt_init,
 	.restart	=	spear_restart,
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear6xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear6xx.c
index ec8eefb..8b0295a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear6xx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear6xx.c
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
 #include <linux/amba/pl08x.h>
 #include <linux/clk.h>
 #include <linux/err.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/of_address.h>
 #include <linux/of_platform.h>
@@ -423,7 +422,6 @@ static const char *spear600_dt_board_compat[] = {
 
 DT_MACHINE_START(SPEAR600_DT, "ST SPEAr600 (Flattened Device Tree)")
 	.map_io		=	spear6xx_map_io,
-	.init_irq	=	irqchip_init,
 	.init_time	=	spear6xx_timer_init,
 	.init_machine	=	spear600_dt_init,
 	.restart	=	spear_restart,
-- 
1.8.1.2

[PATCH 14/20] ARM: msm: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Maxime Ripard]

Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for msm as well.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8660.c | 2 --
 arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8960.c | 2 --
 2 files changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8660.c b/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8660.c
index 7dcfc53..492f5cd 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8660.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8660.c
@@ -11,7 +11,6 @@
  */
 
 #include <linux/init.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/of_platform.h>
 
@@ -44,7 +43,6 @@ static const char *msm8x60_fluid_match[] __initdata = {
 DT_MACHINE_START(MSM_DT, "Qualcomm MSM (Flattened Device Tree)")
 	.smp = smp_ops(msm_smp_ops),
 	.map_io = msm_map_msm8x60_io,
-	.init_irq = irqchip_init,
 	.init_machine = msm8x60_dt_init,
 	.init_late = msm8x60_init_late,
 	.init_time	= msm_dt_timer_init,
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8960.c b/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8960.c
index 7301936..bb55309 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8960.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8960.c
@@ -11,7 +11,6 @@
  */
 
 #include <linux/init.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
 #include <linux/of_platform.h>
 
 #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
@@ -31,7 +30,6 @@ static const char * const msm8960_dt_match[] __initconst = {
 DT_MACHINE_START(MSM8960_DT, "Qualcomm MSM (Flattened Device Tree)")
 	.smp = smp_ops(msm_smp_ops),
 	.map_io = msm_map_msm8960_io,
-	.init_irq = irqchip_init,
 	.init_time	= msm_dt_timer_init,
 	.init_machine = msm_dt_init,
 	.dt_compat = msm8960_dt_match,
-- 
1.8.1.2

Re: [PATCH 14/20] ARM: msm: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[David Brown]

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:38:47PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> declaration for msm as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8660.c | 2 --
>  arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8960.c | 2 --
>  2 files changed, 4 deletions(-)

I've replaced the patch in my msm-cleanup tree with this one.  I'll
push this out once the support goes into the arm soc tree.

David

-- 
sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

[PATCH 15/20] ARM: mvebu: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Maxime Ripard]

Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for mvebu as well.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
---
 arch/arm/mach-mvebu/armada-370-xp.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/armada-370-xp.c b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/armada-370-xp.c
index 42a4cb3..c04fed8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/armada-370-xp.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/armada-370-xp.c
@@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
 #include <linux/clk/mvebu.h>
 #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
 #include <linux/mbus.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
 #include <asm/hardware/cache-l2x0.h>
 #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
 #include <asm/mach/map.h>
@@ -96,7 +95,6 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(ARMADA_XP_DT, "Marvell Armada 370/XP (Device Tree)")
 	.init_machine	= armada_370_xp_dt_init,
 	.map_io		= armada_370_xp_map_io,
 	.init_early	= armada_370_xp_init_early,
-	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
 	.init_time	= armada_370_xp_timer_and_clk_init,
 	.restart	= mvebu_restart,
 	.dt_compat	= armada_370_xp_dt_compat,
-- 
1.8.1.2

Re: [PATCH 15/20] ARM: mvebu: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Jason Cooper]

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:38:48PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> declaration for mvebu as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-mvebu/armada-370-xp.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

Applied to mvebu/cleanup

thx,

Jason.

[PATCH 16/20] ARM: mxs: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Maxime Ripard]

Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for mxs as well.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mxs.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mxs.c b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mxs.c
index 5b62b64..66fe810 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mxs.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mxs.c
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
 #include <linux/err.h>
 #include <linux/gpio.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
 #include <linux/irqchip/mxs.h>
 #include <linux/micrel_phy.h>
 #include <linux/of_address.h>
@@ -435,7 +434,6 @@ static const char *mxs_dt_compat[] __initdata = {
 
 DT_MACHINE_START(MXS, "Freescale MXS (Device Tree)")
 	.map_io		= debug_ll_io_init,
-	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
 	.handle_irq	= icoll_handle_irq,
 	.init_time	= mxs_timer_init,
 	.init_machine	= mxs_machine_init,
-- 
1.8.1.2

Re: [PATCH 16/20] ARM: mxs: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Shawn Guo]

On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:38:49PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> declaration for mxs as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>

Applied, thanks.

[PATCH 17/20] ARM: sirf: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Maxime Ripard]

Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for sirf as well.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Barry Song <Baohua.Song@csr.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-prima2/common.c | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-prima2/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-prima2/common.c
index 4f94cd8..a9f475c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-prima2/common.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-prima2/common.c
@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
 #include <linux/clocksource.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
 #include <asm/sizes.h>
 #include <asm/mach-types.h>
 #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
@@ -55,7 +54,6 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(ATLAS6_DT, "Generic ATLAS6 (Flattened Device Tree)")
 	/* Maintainer: Barry Song <baohua.song@csr.com> */
 	.nr_irqs	= 128,
 	.map_io         = sirfsoc_map_io,
-	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
 	.init_time	= sirfsoc_init_time,
 	.init_machine	= sirfsoc_mach_init,
 	.init_late	= sirfsoc_init_late,
@@ -74,7 +72,6 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(PRIMA2_DT, "Generic PRIMA2 (Flattened Device Tree)")
 	/* Maintainer: Barry Song <baohua.song@csr.com> */
 	.nr_irqs	= 128,
 	.map_io         = sirfsoc_map_io,
-	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
 	.init_time	= sirfsoc_init_time,
 	.dma_zone_size	= SZ_256M,
 	.init_machine	= sirfsoc_mach_init,
@@ -94,7 +91,6 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(MARCO_DT, "Generic MARCO (Flattened Device Tree)")
 	/* Maintainer: Barry Song <baohua.song@csr.com> */
 	.smp            = smp_ops(sirfsoc_smp_ops),
 	.map_io         = sirfsoc_map_io,
-	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
 	.init_time	= sirfsoc_init_time,
 	.init_machine	= sirfsoc_mach_init,
 	.init_late	= sirfsoc_init_late,
-- 
1.8.1.2

[PATCH 18/20] ARM: vexpress: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Maxime Ripard]

Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for vexpress as well.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c
index 8802030..d601697 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c
@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
 #include <linux/clocksource.h>
 #include <linux/smp.h>
 #include <linux/init.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
 #include <linux/of_address.h>
 #include <linux/of_fdt.h>
 #include <linux/of_irq.h>
@@ -458,7 +457,6 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(VEXPRESS_DT, "ARM-Versatile Express")
 	.smp		= smp_ops(vexpress_smp_ops),
 	.map_io		= v2m_dt_map_io,
 	.init_early	= v2m_dt_init_early,
-	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
 	.init_time	= v2m_dt_timer_init,
 	.init_machine	= v2m_dt_init,
 MACHINE_END
-- 
1.8.1.2

[PATCH 19/20] ARM: virt: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Maxime Ripard]

Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for virt as well.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-virt/virt.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-virt/virt.c b/arch/arm/mach-virt/virt.c
index 061f283..bdf05f4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-virt/virt.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-virt/virt.c
@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@
  * along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
  */
 
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
 #include <linux/of_irq.h>
 #include <linux/of_platform.h>
 #include <linux/smp.h>
@@ -39,7 +38,6 @@ static const char *virt_dt_match[] = {
 extern struct smp_operations virt_smp_ops;
 
 DT_MACHINE_START(VIRT, "Dummy Virtual Machine")
-	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
 	.init_machine	= virt_init,
 	.smp		= smp_ops(virt_smp_ops),
 	.dt_compat	= virt_dt_match,
-- 
1.8.1.2

[PATCH 20/20] ARM: vt8500: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Maxime Ripard]

Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for vt8500 as well.

Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c b/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c
index 1dd281e..70a5ac9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c
@@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
 
 #include <linux/clocksource.h>
 #include <linux/io.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
 #include <linux/pm.h>
 
 #include <asm/mach-types.h>
@@ -178,7 +177,6 @@ static const char * const vt8500_dt_compat[] = {
 DT_MACHINE_START(WMT_DT, "VIA/Wondermedia SoC (Device Tree Support)")
 	.dt_compat	= vt8500_dt_compat,
 	.map_io		= vt8500_map_io,
-	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
 	.init_machine	= vt8500_init,
 	.init_time	= clocksource_of_init,
 	.restart	= vt8500_restart,
-- 
1.8.1.2

Re: [PATCH 20/20] ARM: vt8500: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Tony Prisk]

On 15/05/13 03:38, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> declaration for vt8500 as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c | 2 --
>   1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c b/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c
> index 1dd281e..70a5ac9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
>   
>   #include <linux/clocksource.h>
>   #include <linux/io.h>
> -#include <linux/irqchip.h>
>   #include <linux/pm.h>
>   
>   #include <asm/mach-types.h>
> @@ -178,7 +177,6 @@ static const char * const vt8500_dt_compat[] = {
>   DT_MACHINE_START(WMT_DT, "VIA/Wondermedia SoC (Device Tree Support)")
>   	.dt_compat	= vt8500_dt_compat,
>   	.map_io		= vt8500_map_io,
> -	.init_irq	= irqchip_init,
>   	.init_machine	= vt8500_init,
>   	.init_time	= clocksource_of_init,
>   	.restart	= vt8500_restart,
I don't have any plans to touch this driver, so please send direct to 
arm-soc as Arnd
requested.

Acked-by: Tony Prisk <linux@prisktech.co.nz>

Regards
Tony Prisk

Re: [PATCH 20/20] ARM: vt8500: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description

[Maxime Ripard]

Hi Tony,

Le 15/05/2013 20:52, Tony Prisk a écrit :
> I don't have any plans to touch this driver, so please send direct to
> arm-soc as Arnd
> requested.
> 
> Acked-by: Tony Prisk <linux@prisktech.co.nz>

Thanks!

I will send it then.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Re: [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Tuesday 14 May 2013, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> This is a splitted up version of the patch I previously sent to
> remove the explicit declaration of irqchip_init as the init_irq callback in
> the machine descriptions.
> 
> Since it was a pretty tricky patch to merge, since it was touching a lot of
> different platforms, I splitted it for each platforms, and rebased it on top
> of 3.10-rc1.
> 
> The best way to merge it is probably that each one of us take into their tree
> the patches that are relevant for our architecture and send them to arm-soc
> later on.

Sounds good to me. I'm sure that some platform maintainers will fail to
apply this though. Could you send whatever remains as a separate branch
in a couple of weeks so we can directly apply it to next/cleanup?

	Arnd

Re: [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls

[Maxime Ripard]

Hi Arnd,

Le 15/05/2013 14:55, Arnd Bergmann a écrit :
> On Tuesday 14 May 2013, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> This is a splitted up version of the patch I previously sent to
>> remove the explicit declaration of irqchip_init as the init_irq callback in
>> the machine descriptions.
>>
>> Since it was a pretty tricky patch to merge, since it was touching a lot of
>> different platforms, I splitted it for each platforms, and rebased it on top
>> of 3.10-rc1.
>>
>> The best way to merge it is probably that each one of us take into their tree
>> the patches that are relevant for our architecture and send them to arm-soc
>> later on.
> 
> Sounds good to me. I'm sure that some platform maintainers will fail to
> apply this though. Could you send whatever remains as a separate branch
> in a couple of weeks so we can directly apply it to next/cleanup?

Ok, I will.

Thanks,
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com