From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jamie Iles Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/20] ARM: picoxcell: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 23:42:14 +0100 Message-ID: <20130520224214.GA4659@page> References: <1368545933-7430-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <1368545933-7430-5-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <20130514162046.GA16346@page> <519496AC.1070809@free-electrons.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <519496AC.1070809@free-electrons.com> Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Maxime Ripard Cc: Jamie Iles , Michal Simek , Linus Walleij , Simon Horman , Magnus Damm , Christian Daudt , Viresh Kumar , David Brown , Jason Cooper , Andrew Lunn , Gregory Clement , Shawn Guo , Barry Song , Tony Prisk , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:19:56AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi Jamie, >=20 > Le 14/05/2013 18:20, Jamie Iles a =E9crit : > > Hi Maxime, > >=20 > > Thanks for this, I'll add it to my tree. I've modified it slightly= to=20 > > kill off the other irq includes, hopefully that's okay with you. >=20 > Yes, I was pretty conservative since I was not familiar with most of = the > code, but yes, I'm fine with the changes. Thanks Maxime, applied to picoxcell-next. Jamie