From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Josh Cartwright <joshc@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Gilad Avidov <gavidov@codeaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Michael Bohan <mbohan@codeaurora.org>,
Sagar Dharia <sdharia@codeaurora.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] spmi: Linux driver framework for SPMI
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 00:11:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131030001137.GW16735@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <149bbfe89e37376cc176c3aeb6c1fab9e4fd2b91.1382985169.git.joshc@codeaurora.org>
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 01:12:35PM -0500, Josh Cartwright wrote:
> From: Kenneth Heitke <kheitke@codeaurora.org>
>
> System Power Management Interface (SPMI) is a specification
> developed by the MIPI (Mobile Industry Process Interface) Alliance
> optimized for the real time control of Power Management ICs (PMIC).
>
> SPMI is a two-wire serial interface that supports up to 4 master
> devices and up to 16 logical slaves.
>
> The framework supports message APIs, multiple busses (1 controller
> per bus) and multiple clients/slave devices per controller.
I haven't read this in depth, but... if you want to support runtime PM
for your spmi devices, then I suggest that you also include the fragments
to setup runtime PM in the bus-level probe handler and clean it up in
the bus-level remove handler.
What that means is doing what PCI, AMBA and similar buses do:
pm_runtime_get_noresume(dev);
pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
pm_runtime_enable(dev);
ret = driver->probe(dev);
if (ret != 0) {
pm_runtime_disable(dev);
pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev);
pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
}
and:
pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
ret = driver->remove(dev);
pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
pm_runtime_disable(dev);
pm_runtime_set_suspended(dev);
pm_runtime_put_noidle(dev);
What this means is that your devices get runtime enabled by default,
but they have to do a pm_runtime_put() or similar in their probe
function to benefit from it and a balancing pm_runtime_get() in
their remove method.
The set_active() call above may need to be conditional upon whether
the device really is in a powered up state at that point or not.
Others have made comments on various other issues so I won't repeat
those points here.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-30 0:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-28 18:32 [PATCH v3 00/10] Add support for the System Power Management Interface (SPMI) Josh Cartwright
2013-10-28 18:12 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] regmap: add SPMI support Josh Cartwright
2013-10-28 20:01 ` Mark Brown
2013-10-28 18:12 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] rtc: pm8xxx: add support for pm8941 Josh Cartwright
2013-10-29 20:09 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-10-29 20:15 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-10-29 20:20 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-10-29 20:32 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-10-28 18:12 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] spmi: Add MSM PMIC Arbiter SPMI controller Josh Cartwright
2013-10-30 18:05 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-10-30 19:17 ` Josh Cartwright
2013-10-28 18:12 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] of: Add empty for_each_available_child_of_node() macro definition Josh Cartwright
2013-10-29 5:50 ` Rob Herring
2013-10-28 18:12 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] spmi: pmic_arb: add support for interrupt handling Josh Cartwright
2013-10-30 18:17 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-10-30 19:10 ` Josh Cartwright
2013-10-28 18:12 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] spmi: Linux driver framework for SPMI Josh Cartwright
2013-10-29 15:02 ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2013-10-29 16:26 ` Josh Cartwright
2013-10-29 18:00 ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2013-10-29 15:21 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2013-10-29 15:56 ` Josh Cartwright
2013-10-29 16:30 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-10-29 19:18 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2013-10-29 19:26 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2013-10-29 16:52 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-10-30 19:37 ` Josh Cartwright
2013-10-30 19:45 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-10-30 0:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2013-10-28 18:12 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] mfd: pm8x41: add support for Qualcomm 8x41 PMICs Josh Cartwright
2013-10-29 0:40 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-10-29 15:56 ` Lee Jones
2013-10-29 16:03 ` Josh Cartwright
2013-10-28 18:12 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] spmi: add generic SPMI controller binding documentation Josh Cartwright
2013-10-28 18:12 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] spmi: document the PMIC arbiter SPMI bindings Josh Cartwright
2013-10-29 14:08 ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2013-10-29 15:12 ` Josh Cartwright
2013-10-28 18:12 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] mfd: pm8x41: document device tree bindings Josh Cartwright
2013-10-29 14:18 ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2013-10-29 15:05 ` Josh Cartwright
2013-10-29 15:31 ` Ivan T. Ivanov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131030001137.GW16735@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=gavidov@codeaurora.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=joshc@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbohan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sdharia@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).