From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@fifo99.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>,
Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@codeaurora.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ARM: msm: Remove 7x00 support
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:23:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131031192330.GG16735@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131031173506.GA31722@fifo99.com>
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:35:06AM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> ARM and the sub-architectures is already confusing I don't think we need
> to start compounding the problem by allowing random whatever-you-want
> sub-directories from every sub-architecture.
Confusing?
I'm not sure about that. It's actually really simple from my perspective:
arch/arm - the ARM 32-bit architecture
arch/arm/mach-* - support for a single SoC or a group of similar SoCs
arch/arm/plat-* - common support for a set of dissimilar SoCs which want
to share code between themselves
How is that confusing?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-31 19:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-28 20:43 [PATCH 0/4] Remove older ARM msm SoC support David Brown
2013-10-28 20:43 ` [PATCH 1/4] ARM: msm: Remove unused board files David Brown
2013-10-28 20:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: msm: Remove 7x00 support David Brown
2013-10-29 13:21 ` Daniel Walker
2013-10-29 15:37 ` Olof Johansson
2013-10-29 17:08 ` Daniel Walker
2013-10-29 17:39 ` Olof Johansson
2013-10-29 18:40 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-10-29 19:03 ` Daniel Walker
2013-10-30 23:08 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-10-30 23:25 ` Daniel Walker
2013-10-31 0:36 ` Olof Johansson
2013-10-31 2:45 ` Daniel Walker
2013-10-31 5:19 ` Olof Johansson
2013-10-31 12:07 ` Daniel Walker
2013-10-31 15:53 ` Olof Johansson
2013-10-31 16:33 ` Daniel Walker
2013-10-31 17:12 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-10-31 17:35 ` Daniel Walker
2013-10-31 18:51 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-10-31 19:39 ` Daniel Walker
2013-10-31 19:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2013-10-31 19:43 ` Daniel Walker
2013-10-28 20:43 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: msm: Remove 7x30 support David Brown
2013-10-29 21:15 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM: msm: Remove 7x30 supporty Daniel Walker
2013-10-30 13:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-10-28 20:43 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: msm: Remove 8x50 support David Brown
2013-10-29 21:19 ` Daniel Walker
2013-10-30 13:30 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-10-30 15:50 ` Daniel Walker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131031192330.GG16735@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bryanh@codeaurora.org \
--cc=davidb@codeaurora.org \
--cc=dwalker@fifo99.com \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).