From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] ARM: Add Krait L2 register accessor functions Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 17:10:56 +0200 Message-ID: <20140408151056.GH30077@pd.tnic> References: <1396641450-12854-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <1396641450-12854-3-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <20140407201838.GC20822@pd.tnic> <20140407215649.GH9985@codeaurora.org> <20140408064328.GB30077@pd.tnic> <534406BD.8000702@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:41860 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756627AbaDHPLA (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Apr 2014 11:11:00 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <534406BD.8000702@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Christopher Covington Cc: Stephen Boyd , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, Mark Rutland , Russell King , Courtney Cavin On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 10:25:01AM -0400, Christopher Covington wrote: > As I understand it, the license authors. They find it important to maintain > clarity even when files get copied into other projects. > > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html > > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#NoticeInSourceFile Right, so what is wrong with stating the same thing in two lines: "Copyright (c) 2011-2013, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved. This file is licensed under GNU GPLv2. See COPYING for full license text." -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine. --