From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Cc: Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joelf@ti.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Change of TEXT_OFFSET for multi_v7_defconfig
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:05:20 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140422170520.GB23955@obsidianresearch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <535639EE.7040102@linaro.org>
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:44:14AM +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On 17/04/14 21:35, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >>> The above is useful for loading the raw uncompressed Image without
> >>> carrying the full ELF baggage.
> >>
> >> What exactly is the full ELF baggage? Aren't there existing mechanisms to omit
> >> debugging symbols, for example, if size is of concern?
> >
> > FWIW, it is a small non-intrusive change to produce ELFs with the
> > proper LMA, if it is useful for specialized tooling, here is the 3.14
> > version of the patch I created (I see it needs a bit of cleanup..)
> > You must also force PATCH_PHYS_VIRT off.
> >
> > The ELF also has the correct entry point address, so ELF tooling can
> > just jump into it, after setting the proper register values according
> > to the boot protocol.
>
> That might be a useful approach for single platform kernels but I don't
> think such an approach can work for multi-arch kernels since, because
> the RAM can be located anywhere in the address map, the physical load
> address is platform dependant.
Right, I think everyone realizes that.
What this patch does is make kernels that are built with
PLAT_PHYS_OFFSET set and CONFIG_ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT disabled produce
an ELF that reflects the build configuration.
Based on comments from others in the thread this is looking useful for
a variety of cases.
I'm not sure who would need to ack this patch? I can clean it up of course.
Thanks,
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-22 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-15 10:44 Change of TEXT_OFFSET for multi_v7_defconfig Daniel Thompson
2014-04-15 17:53 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-04-16 16:18 ` Christopher Covington
2014-04-16 19:14 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-04-16 21:08 ` Christopher Covington
2014-04-16 21:36 ` Peter Maydell
2014-04-16 22:34 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-16 22:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-16 23:21 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-04-17 18:33 ` Christopher Covington
2014-04-17 19:48 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-04-17 20:49 ` Christopher Covington
2014-04-17 20:54 ` Peter Maydell
2014-04-17 20:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-04-22 9:44 ` Daniel Thompson
2014-04-22 17:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2014-04-22 17:55 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-04-22 18:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-22 14:50 ` Michal Simek
2014-04-22 17:00 ` [Qemu-devel] " Jason Gunthorpe
2014-04-22 17:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-22 17:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-04-22 18:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-22 18:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-22 18:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-22 18:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-04-17 17:11 ` Rob Herring
2014-04-17 20:06 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-04-17 20:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-17 21:18 ` Rob Herring
2014-04-17 21:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-18 2:53 ` Rob Herring
2014-04-18 4:34 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-04-22 10:26 ` Daniel Thompson
2014-04-22 10:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-22 11:41 ` Daniel Thompson
2014-04-18 8:41 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-04-22 9:53 ` Daniel Thompson
2014-04-22 10:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140422170520.GB23955@obsidianresearch.com \
--to=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=cov@codeaurora.org \
--cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=joelf@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).