From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Courtney Cavin Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hwspinlock/msm: Add support for Qualcomm MSM HW Mutex block Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 16:41:29 -0700 Message-ID: <20140829234128.GB25668@sonymobile.com> References: <1409354063-20289-1-git-send-email-bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Return-path: Received: from seldrel01.sonyericsson.com ([212.209.106.2]:17452 "EHLO seldrel01.sonyericsson.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750811AbaH2Xir (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Aug 2014 19:38:47 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1409354063-20289-1-git-send-email-bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Bjorn Andersson Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen , Kumar Gala , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Grant Likely , Suman Anna , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , Jeffrey Hugo , Eric Holmberg On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 01:14:23AM +0200, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > From: Kumar Gala > > Add driver for Qualcomm MSM Hardware Mutex block that exists on > newer Qualcomm SoCs. > > Cc: Jeffrey Hugo > Cc: Eric Holmberg > Cc: Courtney Cavin > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala > [bjorn: added pm_runtime calls, from Courtney, > added sfpb-mutex compatible, > updated DT binding documentation formatting] > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson > --- [...] > diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig b/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig > index 3612cb5..2cd39e2 100644 > --- a/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/Kconfig > @@ -8,6 +8,17 @@ config HWSPINLOCK > > menu "Hardware Spinlock drivers" > > +config HWSPINLOCK_MSM > + tristate "MSM Hardware Spinlock device" > + depends on ARCH_QCOM This should also depend on OF, as it won't compile or work without it. > + select HWSPINLOCK > + help > + Say y here to support the MSM Hardware Mutex functionality, which > + provides a synchronisation mechanism for the various processors on > + the SoC. > + > + If unsure, say N. > + > config HWSPINLOCK_OMAP > tristate "OMAP Hardware Spinlock device" > depends on ARCH_OMAP4 || SOC_OMAP5 || SOC_DRA7XX || SOC_AM33XX || SOC_AM43XX [...] > +static const struct of_device_id msm_hwspinlock_of_match[] = { > + { .compatible = "qcom,sfpb-mutex", .data = (void *)0x4 }, > + { .compatible = "qcom,tcsr-mutex", .data = (void *)0x80 }, > + { }, > +}; MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, msm_hwspinlock_of_match); ? [...] > +static struct platform_driver msm_hwspinlock_driver = { > + .probe = msm_hwspinlock_probe, > + .remove = msm_hwspinlock_remove, > + .driver = { > + .name = "msm_hwspinlock", > + .owner = THIS_MODULE, No need, as: #define platform_driver_register(drv) \ __platform_driver_register(drv, THIS_MODULE) extern int __platform_driver_register(struct platform_driver *, struct module *); > + .of_match_table = msm_hwspinlock_of_match, > + }, > +}; Otherwise, looks fine. -Courtney