From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] regulator: core: Print at debug level on debugfs creation failure Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 19:39:25 +0100 Message-ID: <20150603183925.GU14071@sirena.org.uk> References: <1433209679-31389-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <1433209679-31389-3-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5kA4nwuSW3j1l9NB" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1433209679-31389-3-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Boyd Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nishanth Menon , Viresh Kumar , Srinivas Kandagatla , Andy Gross , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, David Collins List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org --5kA4nwuSW3j1l9NB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 06:47:55PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > The downside of this approach is that whoever gets to debugfs first > the others who come later to not have any debugfs attributes associated > with them. Right, and we do it silently which I'm really not sure about (either way). Let me think... --5kA4nwuSW3j1l9NB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVb0ncAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQgyEH/i0U1fRgK3Im1G8R6t2bgbsW m4+EPIh7RWbcU44m8Pkc0soTQ5RPilkFl0g780zAaiFCuY0RWdIy2QLZ9DgL9Vh7 EzlDgDMzRD1PIo5ioJVShualj4q+4iXY55P11iLtskww0O/9KiRrr/FfDtJoZ705 dvGb+NetO0K465sZ9jU8BZZLTD3wf5gmjgmju7ComU6XWg3hRr0uEy4BTIceIYA5 0JCypjmw8QDbfGkQsngH6Tf3TxovaXiWyqWl01StnzV41UWHc3i/JAcP4jhYv8aD 0j4iurZyFYgiNiSblMcGKuvLwX334FX3Dd7X77jcHZy6/N9sgs9AaZ+XT9mtbhE= =qkim -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5kA4nwuSW3j1l9NB--