From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Gross Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/7] APQ8064 dt patches. Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:06:40 -0500 Message-ID: <20150727190640.GA12739@qualcomm.com> References: <1438004945-16175-1-git-send-email-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:34397 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752790AbbG0TGn (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jul 2015 15:06:43 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1438004945-16175-1-git-send-email-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Srinivas Kandagatla Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Russell King , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 02:49:05PM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote: > Hi Andy, > > Here are some DT patches which are fixes + pmic gpio/mpp nodes for APQ8064. > I tested these patches on APQ8064 based IFC6410 board. These patches are > on top of your qcom/dt branch. > > I got few more DT patches which depend on the pmic gpio and mpp dt-bindings header file, > this header file is already available in the linux-next, Should I send those patches too? > Or wait till it appears on 4.3-rc1? Send em. I can at least add them to my next branch. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project