From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] clk: qcom: Add support for RCGs with shared branches Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:07:22 -0700 Message-ID: <20150916220722.GM23081@codeaurora.org> References: <1442409888-19917-1-git-send-email-georgi.djakov@linaro.org> <1442409888-19917-3-git-send-email-georgi.djakov@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1442409888-19917-3-git-send-email-georgi.djakov@linaro.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Georgi Djakov Cc: mturquette@baylibre.com, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org On 09/16, Georgi Djakov wrote: > +static int clk_rcg2_shared_enable(struct clk_hw *hw) > +{ > + struct clk_rcg2 *rcg = to_clk_rcg2(hw); > + > + if (!rcg->current_freq) { > + struct clk_hw *parent = clk_hw_get_parent(hw); > + unsigned long parent_rate = clk_hw_get_rate(parent); > + > + rcg->current_freq = clk_rcg2_recalc_rate(hw, parent_rate); Hmm no. I meant adding a recal_rate implementation for this specific type of clk_ops that assigns the current_freq value when it's called. I assume we're not calling enable on this clock before we register it with the framework. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project