From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bjorn Andersson Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] dt-binding: remoteproc: Introduce DT binding for Qualcomm slpi subsystem. Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 10:39:16 -0800 Message-ID: <20170112183916.GI10531@minitux> References: <1484229217-23364-1-git-send-email-akdwived@codeaurora.org> <1484229217-23364-3-git-send-email-akdwived@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f174.google.com ([209.85.192.174]:35618 "EHLO mail-pf0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750781AbdALStE (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jan 2017 13:49:04 -0500 Received: by mail-pf0-f174.google.com with SMTP id f144so17138739pfa.2 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 10:49:04 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1484229217-23364-3-git-send-email-akdwived@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org To: Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi Cc: sboyd@codeaurora.org, agross@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, spjoshi@codeaurora.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org On Thu 12 Jan 05:53 PST 2017, Avaneesh Kumar Dwivedi wrote: > This document defines the binding for a component that loads firmware > and control the life cycle of the Qualcomm slpi core. Rather than duplicating the adsp binding I think we should just amend the adsp binding - and probably rename the file. > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,slpi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,slpi.txt [..] > += EXAMPLE [..] > + clocks = <&rpmcc MSM8996_RPM_SMD_XO_CLK_SRC>, > + <&rpmcc MSM8996_RPM_SMD_AGGR2_NOC_CLK>; > + clock-names = "xo", > + "aggre2"; > + I still haven't managed to acquire the block diagram for this chip and we have ongoing msm_bus discussions, but I believe we want something representing a bus to control this clock. Regards, Bjorn