From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: "Barry Song" <baohua@kernel.org>,
"linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
"Neil Armstrong" <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
"Tony Lindgren" <tony@atomide.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
"Sudeep Holla" <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
"Liviu Dudau" <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
"Patrice Chotard" <patrice.chotard@st.com>,
"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>,
"David Brown" <david.brown@linaro.org>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
"Kukjin Kim" <kgene@kernel.org>,
"Viresh Kumar" <vireshk@kernel.org>,
"Andy Gross" <andy.gross@linaro.org>,
linux-oxnas@groups.io, linux-soc@vger.kernel.org,
"Shiraz Hashim" <shiraz.linux.kernel@gmail.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Clean up ARM SMP/CPU hotplug implementations
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 11:05:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181220110503.GO9507@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJKOXPdkebh8P4u=uqAxuoh_xxsdSfKeyy3ccDEiScstb_J_pg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 11:23:57AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 11:11, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > Since almost no one has responded, my intention is to queue up
> > patches 1-3,5-8 for the Christmas-time merge window through my
> > tree. They will be in linux-next tonight.
>
> AFAIU, the patch 9 (or entire patchset) was not build tested, did not
> compile and therefore was not in linux-next. Sending something, which
> was not building, to linux-next just few days before Christmas merge
> window makes the schedule really tight. Especially that during
> Christmas some people might be offline.
If you're only testing linux-next, then you have a hole in your test
regime.
> I think it should sit in linux-next for few weeks... it should sit
> there already so the auto-testers would try it. At least if it were in
> linux-next, the booting and few simple tests were already done, e.g.
> by my boards, without any additional effort.
As I've said, I'm omitting patches 4 and 9. Patch 9 is the troublesome
patch and can't be merged anyway since patch 4 is going via the STi
maintainer along with other changes. The remainder of the patch set
are all specific to individual platforms, some of which have been
acked, but most platform maintainers have not responded in _any_ way.
You are aware that the autobuilders do build patches sent to the
mailing list, and then we have kernelci which builds my tree, builds
linux-next etc. There's multiple stages of build test that such
stuff goes through.
Lastly, linux-next is not a general test tree, it is for integration
testing of code destined for the _NEXT_ merge window. The clue is
in the name. It is not for code destined for the following merge
window - only code for _this_ merge window should be in linux-next.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-20 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-13 17:59 [PATCH 0/9] Clean up ARM SMP/CPU hotplug implementations Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-12-13 18:00 ` [PATCH 1/9] ARM: omap2: remove unnecessary boot_lock Russell King
2018-12-13 18:00 ` [PATCH 2/9] ARM: qcom: " Russell King
2019-01-10 12:50 ` Linus Walleij
2019-01-10 20:56 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-01-10 21:47 ` Linus Walleij
2019-01-11 15:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2019-01-13 22:46 ` Linus Walleij
2019-01-10 22:05 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-12-13 18:00 ` [PATCH 3/9] ARM: oxnas: remove CPU hotplug implementation Russell King
2018-12-20 14:03 ` Neil Armstrong
2018-12-13 18:00 ` [PATCH 4/9] ARM: sti: remove pen_release and boot_lock Russell King
2018-12-17 8:22 ` Patrice CHOTARD
2018-12-13 18:01 ` [PATCH 5/9] ARM: actions: remove boot_lock and pen_release Russell King
2018-12-13 18:01 ` [PATCH 6/9] ARM: vexpress/realview: consolidate immitation CPU hotplug Russell King
2018-12-13 18:01 ` [PATCH 7/9] ARM: versatile: convert boot_lock to raw Russell King
2018-12-13 18:01 ` [PATCH 8/9] ARM: versatile: rename and comment SMP implementation Russell King
2018-12-13 18:01 ` [PATCH 9/9] ARM: smp: remove arch-provided "pen_release" Russell King
2018-12-14 4:39 ` Viresh Kumar
2018-12-14 13:12 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-12-17 6:16 ` Viresh Kumar
2018-12-20 10:10 ` [PATCH 0/9] Clean up ARM SMP/CPU hotplug implementations Russell King - ARM Linux
2018-12-20 10:23 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2018-12-20 11:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181220110503.GO9507@n2100.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=andy.gross@linaro.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=david.brown@linaro.org \
--cc=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-oxnas@groups.io \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
--cc=patrice.chotard@st.com \
--cc=shiraz.linux.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=vireshk@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).