[PATCH v3 1/3] clk: qcom: clk-alpha-pll: Remove post_div_table checks

Vinod Koul
2019-06-25T06:35:08Z

We want users to code properly and fix the post_div_table missing and
not reply on core to check. So remove the post_div_table check.

Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
---
drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c | 15 ---------------
1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c
index b48707693ffd..2c6773188761 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c
@@ -1036,11 +1036,6 @@ static unsigned long clk_alpha_pll_postdiv_fabia_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
u32 i, div = 1, val;
int ret;

- if (!pll->post_div_table) {
- pr_err("Missing the post_div_table for the PLL\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
ret = regmap_read(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_USER_CTL(pll), &val);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -1063,11 +1058,6 @@ static long clk_alpha_pll_postdiv_fabia_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
{
struct clk_alpha_pll_postdiv *pll = to_clk_alpha_pll_postdiv(hw);

- if (!pll->post_div_table) {
- pr_err("Missing the post_div_table for the PLL\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
return divider_round_rate(hw, rate, prate, pll->post_div_table,
pll->width, CLK_DIVIDER_ROUND_CLOSEST);
}
@@ -1089,11 +1079,6 @@ static int clk_alpha_pll_postdiv_fabia_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
if (val & PLL_VOTE_FSM_ENA)
return 0;

- if (!pll->post_div_table) {
- pr_err("Missing the post_div_table for the PLL\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
div = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(parent_rate, rate);
for (i = 0; i < pll->num_post_div; i++) {
if (pll->post_div_table[i].div == div) {
--
2.20.1