From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Deepak Katragadda <dkatraga@codeaurora.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
David Brown <david.brown@linaro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Taniya Das <tdas@codeaurora.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] clk: qcom: gcc: Add global clock controller driver for SM8150
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 14:31:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190627213151.B94FA20B7C@mail.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190625063140.17106-4-vkoul@kernel.org>
Quoting Vinod Koul (2019-06-24 23:31:40)
> From: Deepak Katragadda <dkatraga@codeaurora.org>
>
> Add the clocks supported in global clock controller which clock the
> peripherals like BLSPs, SDCC, USB, MDSS etc. Register all the clocks
> to the clock framework for the clients to be able to request for them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak Katragadda <dkatraga@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <tdas@codeaurora.org>
> [vkoul: port to upstream and tidy-up]
This can say "changed to parent_data scheme"?
> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.txt | 1 +
> drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig | 7 +
> drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sm8150.c | 3719 +++++++++++++++++
> include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sm8150.h | 243 ++
> 5 files changed, 3971 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sm8150.c
> create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sm8150.h
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.txt
> index 8661c3cd3ccf..1b39d949e63d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.txt
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ Required properties :
> "qcom,gcc-sdm630"
> "qcom,gcc-sdm660"
> "qcom,gcc-sdm845"
> + "qcom,gcc-sm8150"
>
> - reg : shall contain base register location and length
> - #clock-cells : shall contain 1
I'd expect the binding to get a larger update indicating which clks come
from outside the clk controller and need to be specified as 'clocks' and
'clock-names'.
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig b/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig
> index 18bdf34d5e64..076872d195fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig
> @@ -291,6 +291,13 @@ config SDM_LPASSCC_845
> Say Y if you want to use the LPASS branch clocks of the LPASS clock
> controller to reset the LPASS subsystem.
>
> +config SM_GCC_8150
> + tristate "SM8150 Global Clock Controller"
> + help
> + Support for the global clock controller on SM8150 devices.
> + Say Y if you want to use peripheral devices such as UART,
> + SPI, I2C, USB, SD/eMMC, PCIe etc.
Is there eMMC support?
> +
> config SPMI_PMIC_CLKDIV
> tristate "SPMI PMIC clkdiv Support"
> depends on SPMI || COMPILE_TEST
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile b/drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile
> index f0768fb1f037..4a813b4055d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile
> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SDM_GCC_845) += gcc-sdm845.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SDM_GPUCC_845) += gpucc-sdm845.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SDM_LPASSCC_845) += lpasscc-sdm845.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SDM_VIDEOCC_845) += videocc-sdm845.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SM_GCC_8150) += gcc-sm8150.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SPMI_PMIC_CLKDIV) += clk-spmi-pmic-div.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_KPSS_XCC) += kpss-xcc.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_HFPLL) += hfpll.o
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sm8150.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sm8150.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..11cd9e19f18d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sm8150.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,3719 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (c) 2017-19, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
Is it really 2017-19 and not 2017-2019?
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/bitops.h>
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
Is this include used?
> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> +#include <linux/reset-controller.h>
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-sm8150.h>
> +
> +#include "common.h"
> +#include "clk-alpha-pll.h"
> +#include "clk-branch.h"
> +#include "clk-pll.h"
> +#include "clk-rcg.h"
> +#include "clk-regmap.h"
> +#include "reset.h"
> +
> +#define GCC_NPU_MISC 0x4d110
> +#define GCC_GPU_MISC 0x71028
Drop these defines please and inline the values.
> +
> +enum {
> + P_BI_TCXO,
> + P_AUD_REF_CLK,
> + P_CORE_BI_PLL_TEST_SE,
> + P_GPLL0_OUT_EVEN,
> + P_GPLL0_OUT_MAIN,
> + P_GPLL4_OUT_MAIN,
> + P_GPLL7_OUT_MAIN,
> + P_GPLL9_OUT_MAIN,
> + P_SLEEP_CLK,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct parent_map gcc_parent_map_0[] = {
> + { P_BI_TCXO, 0 },
> + { P_GPLL0_OUT_MAIN, 1 },
> + { P_GPLL0_OUT_EVEN, 6 },
> + { P_CORE_BI_PLL_TEST_SE, 7 },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct clk_parent_data gcc_parents_0[] = {
> + { .fw_name = "bi_tcxo", .name = "bi_tcxo" },
> + { .fw_name = "gpll0", .name = "gpll0" },
> + { .fw_name = "gpll0_out_even", .name = "gpll0_out_even" },
> + { .fw_name = "core_bi_pll_test_se", .name = "core_bi_pll_test_se" },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct clk_parent_data gcc_parents_0_ao[] = {
> + { .fw_name = "bi_tcxo_ao", .name = "bi_tcxo_ao" },
> + { .fw_name = "gpll0", .name = "gpll0" },
> + { .fw_name = "gpll0_out_even", .name = "gpll0_out_even" },
> + { .fw_name = "core_bi_pll_test_se", .name = "core_bi_pll_test_se" },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct parent_map gcc_parent_map_1[] = {
> + { P_BI_TCXO, 0 },
> + { P_GPLL0_OUT_MAIN, 1 },
> + { P_SLEEP_CLK, 5 },
> + { P_GPLL0_OUT_EVEN, 6 },
> + { P_CORE_BI_PLL_TEST_SE, 7 },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct clk_parent_data gcc_parents_1[] = {
> + { .fw_name = "bi_tcxo", .name = "bi_tcxo" },
> + { .fw_name = "gpll0", .name = "gpll0" },
> + { .fw_name = "sleep_clk", .name = "sleep_clk" },
> + { .fw_name = "gpll0_out_even", .name = "gpll0_out_even" },
> + { .fw_name = "core_bi_pll_test_se", .name = "core_bi_pll_test_se" },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct parent_map gcc_parent_map_2[] = {
> + { P_BI_TCXO, 0 },
> + { P_SLEEP_CLK, 5 },
> + { P_CORE_BI_PLL_TEST_SE, 7 },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct clk_parent_data gcc_parents_2[] = {
> + { .fw_name = "bi_tcxo", .name = "bi_tcxo" },
> + { .fw_name = "sleep_clk", .name = "sleep_clk" },
> + { .fw_name = "core_bi_pll_test_se", .name = "core_bi_pll_test_se" },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct parent_map gcc_parent_map_3[] = {
> + { P_BI_TCXO, 0 },
> + { P_GPLL0_OUT_MAIN, 1 },
> + { P_CORE_BI_PLL_TEST_SE, 7 },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct clk_parent_data gcc_parents_3[] = {
> + { .fw_name = "bi_tcxo", .name = "bi_tcxo" },
> + { .fw_name = "gpll0", .name = "gpll0" },
> + { .fw_name = "core_bi_pll_test_se", .name = "core_bi_pll_test_se" },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct parent_map gcc_parent_map_4[] = {
> + { P_BI_TCXO, 0 },
> + { P_CORE_BI_PLL_TEST_SE, 7 },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct clk_parent_data gcc_parents_4[] = {
> + { .fw_name = "bi_tcxo", .name = "bi_tcxo" },
> + { .fw_name = "core_bi_pll_test_se", .name = "core_bi_pll_test_se" },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct parent_map gcc_parent_map_5[] = {
> + { P_BI_TCXO, 0 },
> + { P_GPLL0_OUT_MAIN, 1 },
> + { P_GPLL7_OUT_MAIN, 3 },
> + { P_GPLL0_OUT_EVEN, 6 },
> + { P_CORE_BI_PLL_TEST_SE, 7 },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct clk_parent_data gcc_parents_5[] = {
> + { .fw_name = "bi_tcxo", .name = "bi_tcxo" },
> + { .fw_name = "gpll0", .name = "gpll0" },
> + { .fw_name = "gpll7", .name = "gpll7" },
> + { .fw_name = "gpll0_out_even", .name = "gpll0_out_even" },
Aren't these gplls all created in this file? They shouldn't be listed in
DT so I'm confused why we have .fw_name for them.
> + { .fw_name = "core_bi_pll_test_se", .name = "core_bi_pll_test_se" },
If there isn't a legacy string name for core_bi_pll_test_se we should
just leave it out and not have a .name field, just the .fw_name one.
> +};
> +
> +static const struct parent_map gcc_parent_map_6[] = {
> + { P_BI_TCXO, 0 },
> + { P_GPLL0_OUT_MAIN, 1 },
> + { P_GPLL9_OUT_MAIN, 2 },
> + { P_GPLL4_OUT_MAIN, 5 },
> + { P_GPLL0_OUT_EVEN, 6 },
> + { P_CORE_BI_PLL_TEST_SE, 7 },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct clk_parent_data gcc_parents_6[] = {
> + { .fw_name = "bi_tcxo", .name = "bi_tcxo" },
> + { .fw_name = "gpll0", .name = "gpll0" },
> + { .fw_name = "gpll9", .name = "gpll9" },
> + { .fw_name = "gpll4", .name = "gpll4" },
> + { .fw_name = "gpll0_out_even", .name = "gpll0_out_even" },
> + { .fw_name = "core_bi_pll_test_se", .name = "core_bi_pll_test_se" },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct parent_map gcc_parent_map_7[] = {
> + { P_BI_TCXO, 0 },
> + { P_GPLL0_OUT_MAIN, 1 },
> + { P_AUD_REF_CLK, 2 },
> + { P_GPLL0_OUT_EVEN, 6 },
> + { P_CORE_BI_PLL_TEST_SE, 7 },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct clk_parent_data gcc_parents_7[] = {
> + { .fw_name = "bi_tcxo", .name = "bi_tcxo" },
> + { .fw_name = "gpll0", .name = "gpll0" },
> + { .fw_name = "aud_ref_clk", .name = "aud_ref_clk" },
> + { .fw_name = "gpll0_out_even", .name = "gpll0_out_even" },
> + { .fw_name = "core_bi_pll_test_se", .name = "core_bi_pll_test_se" },
> +};
> +
> +static struct pll_vco trion_vco[] = {
const?
> + { 249600000, 2000000000, 0 },
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_alpha_pll gpll0 = {
> + .offset = 0x0,
> + .vco_table = trion_vco,
> + .num_vco = ARRAY_SIZE(trion_vco),
> + .regs = clk_alpha_pll_regs[CLK_ALPHA_PLL_TYPE_TRION],
> + .clkr = {
> + .enable_reg = 0x52000,
> + .enable_mask = BIT(0),
> + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> + .name = "gpll0",
> + .parent_data = &(const struct clk_parent_data){
> + .fw_name = "bi_tcxo",
> + .name = "bi_tcxo",
> + },
> + .num_parents = 1,
> + .ops = &clk_trion_fixed_pll_ops,
> + },
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static const struct clk_div_table post_div_table_trion_even[] = {
> + { 0x0, 1 },
> + { 0x1, 2 },
> + { 0x3, 4 },
> + { 0x7, 8 },
> + { }
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_alpha_pll_postdiv gpll0_out_even = {
> + .offset = 0x0,
> + .post_div_shift = 8,
> + .post_div_table = post_div_table_trion_even,
> + .num_post_div = ARRAY_SIZE(post_div_table_trion_even),
> + .regs = clk_alpha_pll_regs[CLK_ALPHA_PLL_TYPE_TRION],
> + .width = 4,
> + .clkr.hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> + .name = "gpll0_out_even",
> + .parent_data = &(const struct clk_parent_data){
> + .fw_name = "gpll0",
> + .name = "gpll0",
Use a direct pointer? This applies in many places in the code.
> + },
> + .num_parents = 1,
> + .ops = &clk_trion_pll_postdiv_ops,
> + },
> +};
> +
[...]
> +
> +static struct clk_branch gcc_video_ahb_clk = {
> + .halt_reg = 0xb004,
> + .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT_DELAY,
> + .hwcg_reg = 0xb004,
> + .hwcg_bit = 1,
> + .clkr = {
> + .enable_reg = 0xb004,
> + .enable_mask = BIT(0),
> + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> + .name = "gcc_video_ahb_clk",
> + .flags = CLK_IS_CRITICAL,
Can you please add a comment around all CLK_IS_CRITICAL flags indicating
why these clks can't be turned off?
> + .ops = &clk_branch2_ops,
> + },
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_branch gcc_video_axi0_clk = {
> + .halt_reg = 0xb024,
> + .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT,
> + .clkr = {
> + .enable_reg = 0xb024,
> + .enable_mask = BIT(0),
> + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> + .name = "gcc_video_axi0_clk",
> + .ops = &clk_branch2_ops,
> + },
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_branch gcc_video_axi1_clk = {
> + .halt_reg = 0xb028,
> + .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT,
> + .clkr = {
> + .enable_reg = 0xb028,
> + .enable_mask = BIT(0),
> + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> + .name = "gcc_video_axi1_clk",
> + .ops = &clk_branch2_ops,
> + },
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_branch gcc_video_axic_clk = {
> + .halt_reg = 0xb02c,
> + .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT,
> + .clkr = {
> + .enable_reg = 0xb02c,
> + .enable_mask = BIT(0),
> + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> + .name = "gcc_video_axic_clk",
> + .ops = &clk_branch2_ops,
> + },
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static struct clk_branch gcc_video_xo_clk = {
> + .halt_reg = 0xb040,
> + .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT_DELAY,
Why doesn't the halt bit work?
> + .clkr = {
> + .enable_reg = 0xb040,
> + .enable_mask = BIT(0),
> + .hw.init = &(struct clk_init_data){
> + .name = "gcc_video_xo_clk",
> + .flags = CLK_IS_CRITICAL,
> + .ops = &clk_branch2_ops,
> + },
> + },
> +};
> +
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-27 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-25 6:31 [PATCH v3 0/3] clk: qcom: Add support for SM8150 GCC Vinod Koul
2019-06-25 6:31 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] clk: qcom: clk-alpha-pll: Remove post_div_table checks Vinod Koul
2019-06-27 21:37 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-06-29 11:14 ` Vinod Koul
2019-07-16 0:08 ` Bjorn Andersson
2019-07-16 4:08 ` Vinod Koul
2019-06-25 6:31 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] clk: qcom: clk-alpha-pll: Add support for Trion PLLs Vinod Koul
2019-06-27 21:50 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-06-29 12:28 ` Vinod Koul
[not found] ` <20190625063140.17106-4-vkoul@kernel.org>
2019-06-27 21:31 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2019-06-29 13:51 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] clk: qcom: gcc: Add global clock controller driver for SM8150 Vinod Koul
2019-07-15 23:01 ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-16 4:07 ` Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190627213151.B94FA20B7C@mail.kernel.org \
--to=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=david.brown@linaro.org \
--cc=dkatraga@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=tdas@codeaurora.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox